To continue the Betamax hijack...
ChuckNelson wrote:
you made the intelligent choice with betamax.
ChuckNelson wrote:
Quantity over quality.
I worked at a store while in college that the bread and butter was consumer recorders, camcorders and movies. IMHO it was a combination of record time, licensing issues and cost that killed Betamax. My view is that Sony missed the mark regarding recording time (which obviously was a serious interest to consumers) and then shot themselves in the foot with how they licensed the technology. For the average consumer, the image quality differencet between Betamax and VHS was not as huge as something like VHS vs. DVD is today. If anyone, I blame Sony for the screw up. There are plenty of business studies into the entire Betamax failure.
ChuckNelson wrote:
When I took some production classes about ten years ago there was still a fair amount of commercial work done on betamax.
As Jim mentioned, I think you are talking about a related technology. It is called "Betacam". Since both were created by Sony, you get the "Beta" part for both product names. Early Betacam used the same tape cart as Betamax, but the recording formats (how audio and video are stored on the tape) are different. From the start Betacam was designed to be a professional format and it became the defacto standard for a long time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betacam
_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.comMoney can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.