Dude, why are you doing this to us?

I thought the current rule was working OK. And I don't, frankly, see a way to objectify without making it a lot more complicated for everyone.
On one hand, I don't think it would be practical or desirable to create a tire exclusion list, because that burdens us with a maintenance task, and it shifts our (RXVPs) focus away from the events and the series and towards rule enforcement.
On the other, if we go to an objective measurement (like the 0.22" tread gap), then the folks at (limit + 0.01") will be bitching about it (as you well know), and saying that they're not ready to buy a special set of tires just to meet the rule. And at this point I'm still not inclined to turn away paying customers if their tires are at all reasonable. Plus, any rule like that means the tech inspectors have to be walking around with calipers, which I can't help but see as a red flag that we're taking things too seriously.
We all know there's a tradeoff between performance and course degradation with regard to tires, and so far I think we (meaning all of us rallycrossers) have been managing it pretty well, I think. But if anyone feels otherwise, let's hear about it here, and if there are other, simpler ways to clarify the rule that I've overlooked, I'm always happy to hear them.
Thanks!
_________________
Carl Fisher
Be Cool to the Pizza Dude:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... Id=4651531