How about some results?

Drew O'Neill · **Posted:** Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:38 pm

Ricky, the times you see on the sheet include the cone penalty. The (+) is noting how many cones contributed to the time that is listed.

Charlie Guthrie · **Joined:** Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:14 pm **Posts:** 832

My cones show up..... No VP discount.
Charlie G

RickyBeam · **Posted:** Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:08 pm

None of the previous reports showed like that. The time shown is the course driving time, but the total would be sum(times)+sum(cones)*2+sum(DNFs)*(dnf for that course)

(I'll look at the event data when I get home. axware won't run on win7-64bit)

RickyBeam · **Posted:** Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:31 am

I see... someone clicked an extra box. (there are many of them.) After forcing axware to re-count everything, the numbers come out the same, mostly as my files are uncorrected. (one more reason to backup the system with paper.)

Kevin Allen · **Joined:** Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:42 pm **Posts:** 3479

If that first course hadn't been so busted, Liz would've whipped some asses. 3rd fastest overall behind me and Greg in the afternoon, even with her cone. And hasn't done a rallyx or autox in over a year.

Suck on that, boys.

Drew O'Neill · **Posted:** Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:38 pm

Yeah, well my wife makes a mean chicken pot pie.

Michael Czeiszperger · **Joined:** Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:35 am **Posts:** 861

Damn, how in the world did a beat up sedan come in first in N04?. At least I know the DIRTBOMB isn't holding me back.

RickyBeam · **Posted:** Thu Mar 27, 2014 4:19 pm

Michael Czeiszperger wrote:

Damn, how in the world did a beat up sedan come in first in N04?

A good lobbiest? Adam was a few seconds per run faster than Koroush in the morning, and a total of 3.5s slower in the afternoon. And, btw, Adam had two more faster times in the afternoon that didn't count. (64.189 and 62.005 if my data is correct.)

RayMetts · **Posted:** Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:54 am

Quote:

(64.189 and 62.005 if my data is correct.)

these were my times in the afternoon, not Adam's.

Michael Czeiszperger · **Joined:** Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:35 am **Posts:** 861

RayMetts wrote:

Quote:

(64.189 and 62.005 if my data is correct.)

these were my times in the afternoon, not Adam's.

Jeez, I leave the bus for 10 minutes and the scoring gets messed up... :-)

Looks like someone tried to get rid of a bad run by deleting an entry, which just shifts the times down to the wrong people. You've got to change the run status to RRN to have the software ignore a time, which was the first thing I showed everyone. Doesn't make sense, but there it is.

The scores were written on paper, so the VPs were able to reconstruct the actual times as best they could, so we'll just have to chalk this one to experience and be more careful at the next race.

RayMetts · **Posted:** Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:27 am

so are these results posted in this thread right or are times shifted and different results are sometimes going to different drivers?

also, will these be posted in the results section of the THSCC or Motorsportsreg websites?

Drew O'Neill · **Posted:** Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:20 pm

Some of the times were screwed up the day of the race, but I went back and fixed all the errors by referencing the data in the raw sheets, so the times are correct.
I sent the results to the webmaster to have them put up on the website, I'll try out the whole posting results on motorsportreg as well.

Charlie Guthrie · **Joined:** Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:14 pm **Posts:** 832

Thanks for all the "non-standard" work Drew. This event was fun but was really tough on the staff.
Charlie G

Michael Czeiszperger · **Joined:** Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:35 am **Posts:** 861

Charlie Guthrie wrote:

Thanks for all the "non-standard" work Drew. This event was fun but was really tough on the staff.
Charlie G

How did the grading go?

RayMetts · **Posted:** Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:27 am

Did you guys have to grade the site afterwards, as well?

THSCC Forums

How about some results?

Who is online