|
Mr. Whitney:
Good points! If I may address some of them. Also have some "ideas". While I know that having an idea without follow through is useless, I am not in the position for the next few months to be a "leader" yet (baby on the way). However, I would like to share some ideas that anyone could implement, if they haven't already been discussed. Since this is a thread about open discussion, I think this is the right place to try to foster positive discussion, if not action.
Cones getting dirty:
Sure. I can see that. When we setup a rallyX, the VPs and chairs should KNOW that we are only using the "dirty" cones, and the "clean" cones are for autoX. That is how it has always been. If this is has changed, or needs to be redressed, I am sure we can address that. Still rallyX does not need a lot of cones. I am with Mr. Allen on the point that "less is more" when it comes to course setup for a rallyX.
Making Money:
Now, while I agree we don't want a program digging the whole club into the ground, I don't think any program is explicitly out there "to make money". I am glad to see when HPDE makes money, but of course, that is HPDE. Since we have "trends" and "statistics" on this, I am assuming/hoping that the VPs and "board" have expectations set. I am sure that has been done, but this should be quantifiable, which is a good and valid concern.
Retaining Drivers:
I have some great ideas on this area. To make them "THSCC ideas": We have the DC region at a great location close by. Why not foster that relationship? Cross area championship, and bringing more drivers to BOTH events. While, this means that people would have to have cars that can actually make a 3 hour drive, and be road legal, this isn't for everyone in the club. Also, it brings members IN from other regions that are FAST and GOOD. Win!
RallyX is scary!:
There are now plenty of AWD and FWD cars that can be purchased for cheap. Also, there are plenty that are Nationally competitive. Is there an inherent cost? You betcha. However, I am still running Rally tires from 2006 that still have plenty of life left in them. I don't have to have a huge tire budget like I would for a Nationally competitive autoX car, but I can be Nationally competitive in the right car for less. More of the "cost" goes to maintenance, but I don't necessarily see it as "scary" when the entry level is cheaper and the cost to run an event is less, and you get "more". It is definitely "different" however.
Member/Driver Retention:
There are A LOT of IBMers in this club, IIRC. Isn't the best and first thing to do is to check statistics and figure out how to make things better for the users? I think there is some work to do in this area, but THSCC does have eMail addresses. We also DO have statistics on the people who entered RallyX events for the past 6 years or so. Why not send out a questionnaire to figure out how this can make it better for all those who have taken a chance? This may have been thought of, but if the program is under concern, it would seem sensible to get as much information as possible.
New Course Locations:
Like it's autoX big brother, we need to look at new locations. While not a favorite of everyone, OCS type locations with clay based soil is better for the cars, better for the track maintenance, and better for lots of cars to be run on. We are fortunate and unfortunate to have two radically different soil types within an hour of each other (sandy soil and clay). However, this is something that should be addressed, if not already (project owned by an individual).
Club Cars (this is a "nice to have in the right situation" feature):
With the cost of a rallyX car, I think it would be a "huge win" to have "club cars". With this, you have arrive and drive, and relatively low maintenance costs. This would prb be a program that would have to be owned by the right VP. Still if "money" is an issue, this might be a "for later" item.
Summary:
I think there are valid points, but I also think that it is an exciting area. It does feel more "laid back", and it is a "less defined" structure as autoX. It is just "different". Also, since it isn't as mature as autoX, there is a lot of room for THSCC to be a leader in this area, or at least a good representative, such as it is in autoX.
Thanks for the time, and as I have time, I will bolster the effort THSCC has. I would like to dedicate more time, but a Dad of 1+1 needs to ensure the home front is secure and happy before he plays/works for himself. Thanks for the understanding and open/positive discussion!
- brian
|