⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:08 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Cam or no-cam
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:14 pm
Posts: 832
I'll chime in with Jim's comment, I can easily put on a cam lock harness with my helmet on, but it's considerably more difficult with the latch style (too many moving parts to align).

I'm surprised that no one has mentioned "pull-up" vs "pull-down" tightening for the lap belt. This makes a whole lot of difference depending on the seat and accessibility to the tighteners.

If you want to go really cheap for a track car, buy the latch style for the driver who typically has lot's of time to get situated (unless sharing a car back-to-back) and buy a cam lock for the instructor who typically is jumping in at the last minute with his helmet on. You may loose the first lap while the instructor is trying to get situated with the latches.

And as an aside, if you are a student and want to maximize your track time make sure that the passenger belts are pre-loosened and set up so the instructor can quickly jump in and latch up.
$0.02
Charlie Guthrie

_________________
1998 BMW Z3
1987 BMW 325is
2000 BMW
1996 F250 Turbo Diesel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cam or no-cam
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:04 pm 
Offline
The Giver
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:45 am
Posts: 4566
Location: Bashing BMWs!
Charlie Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned "pull-up" vs "pull-down" tightening for the lap belt.


Great point Charlie. We learned this the hard way when Ryan first had a harness in the Talon. We had the pull-down belts and they were a PITA once you were seated and almost impossible to adjust with the door closed. The pull-up lap belts are a must IMO.

_________________
Vincent Keene
'06 Ford Mustang GT (track rat)
'15 Dodge Charger R/T (yeah, it's got a HEMI!)
'07 Ford Fusion SE (205,000 miles and counting)
'98 Chevy Z-24 (retired)
'93 Acura Integra (Team SWB 24HOL Car)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cam or no-cam
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:18 pm 
Offline
I have a stimulating package
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:59 pm
Posts: 1542
Location: NW Raleigh
Vincent Keene wrote:
Charlie Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned "pull-up" vs "pull-down" tightening for the lap belt.


Great point Charlie. We learned this the hard way when Ryan first had a harness in the Talon. We had the pull-down belts and they were a PITA once you were seated and almost impossible to adjust with the door closed. The pull-up lap belts are a must IMO.


If they fit. We went with pull-downs in the Miata as rumor was that pull-ups end up positioning the adjuster in exactly the wrong spot where it passes through the seat. But yes, pull-downs can be a bit of a pain, and it's easier to adjust with the door open.

_________________
Dustin Fredrickson
-- I'm a nobody --


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cam or no-cam
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:55 pm 
Offline
I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:08 pm
Posts: 1524
Location: Raleigh NC
Charlie Guthrie wrote:

I'm surprised that no one has mentioned "pull-up" vs "pull-down" tightening for the lap belt. This makes a whole lot of difference depending on the seat and accessibility to the tighteners.


Charlie Guthrie


Actually I did back in post #4.
Pull down lap belt adjuster are near impossible with a console next to the seat unless you like the adjuster right on top your leg.
I like pull down shoulders and pull up lap. Donna and I would pop the harness and run the adjusters out on the way back to grid. It's much much easier to latch up if the belts are not tight when you start, then pull them snug. Start with the crotch strap(s), then the lap straps and finally the shoulder straps. In deference to popular belief, the crotch strap is NOT there to keep you from sliding out from under the harness, a very unlikely scenario unless you have the seat fully reclined, but to counter the shoulder straps from pulling the buckle up under your sternum in a crash which can cause massive internal injuries and even death from the harness rather than the accident. There is very specific harness mounting geometry that should be adhered to to also reduce the risk of additional belt injuries. Do some research online, but I think Simpson's site shows diagrams.

_________________
SPIN or WIN!
there's no glory for going slow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cam or no-cam
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:16 pm 
Offline
I have a stimulating package
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:59 pm
Posts: 1542
Location: NW Raleigh
Chuck Frank wrote:
There is very specific harness mounting geometry that should be adhered to to also reduce the risk of additional belt injuries. Do some research online, but I think Simpson's site shows diagrams.


Our track team has summarized much of the harness mounting requirements in the track tech guide, as well.

_________________
Dustin Fredrickson
-- I'm a nobody --


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cam or no-cam
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
Queen of the Guinea Hens
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 11:32 pm
Posts: 3122
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Chuck Frank wrote:
In deference to popular belief, the crotch strap is NOT there to keep you from sliding out from under the harness, a very unlikely scenario unless you have the seat fully reclined, but to counter the shoulder straps from pulling the buckle up under your sternum in a crash which can cause massive internal injuries and even death from the harness rather than the accident.


I'd say it's some of both, actually. Word is that Ernie Irvan didn't have his sub belt attached when he crashed (probably one of those stacking latch systems where the sub belt was just another tab stacked into the latch) and his body DID slide under. Not all the way, but bad enough the shoulder belts cut his face up really badly. I think it also screwed up his legs more than it would have if he would have had a sub belt attached, too.


--Donnie

_________________
My Blog


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Cross Checking
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:14 pm
Posts: 832
I finally had time to check out the original post and checked the G-Force website. The pictured harness is available with a variety of pull arangements:
ADJUSTMENT LENGTHS:
Shoulder
Individual: 26" – 50"
H-Type: 26" – 80"
V-Type: 26" – 34"
Junior: 19" – 35.5"

Lap Belt
Pull-Up: 38" – 67"
Pull-Down: 38" – 80"
Junior: 8.5" – 49"

I will attest to my preference for the 3" wide attachment brackets mentioned, and the "beef roll" end treatment on the straps also is appreciated when trying to cinch down the belts. (The beef roll ends also seem to prevent quite so much flapping in the breeze)

Here's what I have and am pleased with the ease of use:
http://www.discoveryparts.com/cgi-bin/store/commerce.cgi?cart_id=1258164006.271&product=harness_gforce_caml&pid=751

Charlie Guthrie

_________________
1998 BMW Z3
1987 BMW 325is
2000 BMW
1996 F250 Turbo Diesel


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group