⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:09 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Acetone in your gas. Is this the new '100 mpg carb'
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 3:55 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Ok, it seems to be a slow week on the forum. Maybe this will kick things up a notch...

What is the deal with people putting Acetone in their gas. I hear it improves mileage, but what is the downside? Can it damage your car (i.e. eat up seals, etc.) I also hear that you must use gas that is not blended with ethanol.

If this is so great, why isn't everyone doing it? Or is it just the number of black helicopters that is keeping this under covers. ;)

For those of you who don't know what I am talking about and don't know how to use Google, here are a few URLs to get you going.

http://pesn.com/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/

http://www.lubedev.com/smartgas/additive.htm

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:10 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
Tis the BS.

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:13 pm 
Offline
The Giver
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:45 am
Posts: 4566
Location: Bashing BMWs!
Quote:
Using the ScanGauge at 50MPH, my best mileage was 48-52 in my Neon a few weeks ago. Then I stopped the acetone to do some reverse testing. The next four tanks of the same Texaco gas showed 42-43, 37-38, 33-34, 30-31. No acetone when each tank was filled at half-full. The drop was about 20 MPG overall. Recent tests at a steady 50 MPH show 61-63 MPG in the Neon.


I may be a skeptic, but approx. 50MPG in a Neon is pretty damn good. Anyone want to test this idea in a rental?

_________________
Vincent Keene
'06 Ford Mustang GT (track rat)
'15 Dodge Charger R/T (yeah, it's got a HEMI!)
'07 Ford Fusion SE (205,000 miles and counting)
'98 Chevy Z-24 (retired)
'93 Acura Integra (Team SWB 24HOL Car)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:20 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
The only person on the entire intarweb talking about this is one Louis LaPointe. If it really worked, especially considering the events of the past weeks concerning supply, you would have heard about it on every news program out there. I don't believe it for one minute.
o

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:26 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Wes Eargle wrote:
Tis the BS.


Very well might be BS. Can you enlighten us on why you think it is? :)

Someone here at work is giving it a try. I will try to keep in touch with him to see how it goes.

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:28 pm 
Offline
Mr. Wizard
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 3:15 pm
Posts: 85
A minor alteration of surface tension isn't particularly relevant when a liquid is being sprayed out a needle valve with 50 psi behind it. It probably does increase the vapor pressure when added to gasoline or diesel, but that's because the acetone has a higher vapor pressure and not because the gasoline is more prone to vaporize.

It's hogwash.

_________________
1988 Plymouth Reliant


Last edited by joedobner on Tue Sep 13, 2005 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:50 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
If he thinks that the C=O pi stretching frequency disrupts the surface tension of gasoline when it's only 0.2 ppt, he's a looney.

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:14 pm 
Offline
Nay
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:35 pm
Posts: 1273
Location: Raleighwood
I read through the guys paper. I was struck by the fact he saw a 20% difference in fuel economy by using different brands of gas. It is funny I have tracked the fuel economy of my 210 for over 100,000 miles and as I switched brands of gas for price or because of moving I have never seen any real change in mpg over time. I have seen a slow drop as the car has gotten older and the engine has become tired. It has 145,000 on it now and I bought it with 17,000 on it. I tracked it by recording the odometer reading and fuel required to fill the tank up to the restrictor. But I think there is some problem with the guy's mileage data if he sees such fluctuations between brands. I think the OBII data he is using is calculating fuel flow from injector pulse width data and does not take in the pressure differential across the nozzel. I suspect temperature of the fuel ai the injector would also have some effect.

From the 210 data I have I might infer that higher octane would give me better mileage. Since when the car was new to me regular gas was a higher octane and it gave better economy. Of course that is probably not the case.

_________________
George Bright Member # 141
One of the youngest of the old farts.
Yes I voted against you joining the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:27 pm
Posts: 176
Location: Wilmington
There are lots of ways to affect milage for the sake of trying to prove a point. I wouldn't trust this with any vehicle I paid more than $500 for.

I think what Wes was saying is the surface tension of gasoline is already so low that adding acetone to it is going to have a negligable effect.

_________________
'99 Mk IV Jetta VR6 now claimed by the better half.

'90 Miata A-package, Floats like a butterfly and buzzes like a BEE with loudspeakers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:12 pm 
Offline
I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:08 pm
Posts: 1524
Location: Raleigh NC
Acetone is a major ingredient in many of the "octane" boosters, but increasing octane will not produce more power (actually less) or increase fuel economy. Many cars will give fantastic fuel milege at a "steady 50 MPH" especially with an OD tranny it's getting up to 50 that eats up gas!
Our first Taurus wagon had the all electonic dashboard that could calculate the instantaneous or average fuel milege in real time and it was not unusual to see instantanious readings in the 50-60 mpg range.
Is this guy a major stocholder in an acetone distributorship? His claims are highly unscientifically derived and therefore meaningless.

_________________
SPIN or WIN!
there's no glory for going slow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:30 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Ace ... h_Shilling

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:25 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Wes Eargle wrote:
http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Acetone:Josh_Shilling


Wes, you lost me. I looked over this and was not sure what info I was supposed to find. Is it that this guy had lower mileage on his test? That Wiki has a bunch of people posting their results. Some are reporting better mileage and some worse. So it's just hard to say if it is real or Urban Legend.

http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Ace ... Automobile

We need a real scientific test. :) Vincent mentioned to me off-line that this would be a good idea for "Myth Busters". I agree. Someone needs to go to their website and submit that idea (I am too lazy myself).

The guy at work who is trying it has only gone through a single tank with it. I think he went from 13-14 average to 15 MPG in his truck and while I am no statistician, I can't see that as being significant. He is going to keep trying to see if he can find the mystical "sweet spot" regarding the amount of acetone/gallon that works for your car.

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 5:50 pm
Posts: 616
Location: Cary
This has already been Submitted to Myth Busters according to thier message board.

_________________
David Teague
2015 Lexus IS 250c
1994 Honda Del Sol HS 39
2009 Dodge Journey R/T
http://teaguefamily.us


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 5:50 pm
Posts: 616
Location: Cary
Mythbusters test this myth recently... and it made your gas milage worse.

_________________
David Teague
2015 Lexus IS 250c
1994 Honda Del Sol HS 39
2009 Dodge Journey R/T
http://teaguefamily.us


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2006 11:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:04 am
Posts: 22
Location: Chapel Hill
Mythbusters is probably one of the greatest shows ever.

_________________
'93 Mazda RX7, touring ed., 5 spd.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group