shawnwhipple wrote:
On an interesting related subject I read something today about angular torquing of stretch bolts in modern engines. I guess instead of tightening bolts in a series of steps up to the specified torque, in newer engines you tighten to a lower value and then add say 90 degrees of twist from there regardless of torque value. I guess the reason is because the stretch bolts require so much torque to overcome the thread friction that you can't reliably torque them to the correct amount of stretch.
i guess this means my 1993 VW has a modern engine

sweeeeet. seriously though. the manual says to torque to X ft-lbs, then turn another 180 degrees, then another 90. there are a couple likely reasons.
1 - it's torqued in stages to keep the heads from warping. the torques are very high and with soft alloy or just plain aluminum heads, it's easy to warp it if you fully torque one bolt at a time. this way, you effectively torque things down in a gentler fashion.
2 - sometimes, the torque applied isn't an accurate measure of 'how tight' the bolts should be, particularly for stretch bolts. some bolt makers like ARP will say how much the bolt should stretch when it's at the correct 'tightness'. since we can't really measure that with all that metal in the way, they approximate what it takes to stretch the bolt X amount in terms of torque and/or rotations. now they're bored...
oh yeah, it doesn't really matter if you pull on a torque wrench perpendicular to the radius or not. the rotational action of the drive will only 'use' the tangential component of your force in turning the bolt. all the other force you apply is a radial component directed towards or away from the center of rotation, hence it's wasted. so, for a well made wrench, it don't matter none, but you'll just be wasting your breath
edit...more ideas
_________________
www.ncvw.org
1993 VW Corrado VR6 - DSP15 (RIP)
1986 MB 190E 2.3L 16v - STX (SOLD)
1997 BMW M3 3.2L - BS for now