Chuck Branscomb wrote:
As an aside, you'll not find a cheaper source or quicker shipping/order filling than BMW Morristown's online parts site:
http://www.trademotion.com/partlocator/index.cfm?action=catalogcenter&siteid=214320&catalogid=0 fwiw.
If you do pull the intake manifold, definitely borrow one of those walnut shell blasters and clean the intake valves as I've heard (from a BMW PUMA level tech support manager) the direct injected turbo engines (which I think the N55 is) can have significant carbon build up on intake valves.
Michael Westerfield wrote:
At least it isn't a Volvo, right Chuck?

Hey, said Volvo turns 19 this winter, and it's a sad state of affairs to say at 19 years ownership it's the longest I've ever owned a car (prior record was 14 years for my '72 Bavaria...1980-1994).

VK has called dibs on that car for when we're done with it, but if you want to be added to the list, that's cool.

But hey, I do still have my 1975 CanAm, so that holds my vehicle record with 40 years of ownership closing in here next June! At least I don't make car dealerships very happy...
Thanks for the info. He talked to a local performance BMW shop in Winston and I think he's going to pay them to do it. He was shopping around for somewhere to do the Walnut blast anyway and figured they might make him a deal on the labor if they did both at once. They quoted him $700 to do the walnut blast on the intake valves and fix the oil filter housing leak.
You are right about the N55 being direct injected, from what i've seen online the carbon build up can get very bad. This is a pretty common issue on the 3.6L GM V6 also they use in the Camaros and other cars. I'm not sure how GM goes about cleaning it though, I assume they just use a solvent to do a top end cleaning. I'm sure the walnut blast is much better at getting the tough stuff off.
I suggested if he pays for the walnut blast and is going to keep this car he should get himself a catch can, that should at least slow down the carbon build up.