⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:08 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: multi pad clutches versus continuous pad
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 587
Location: Apex, NC
Is there any advantage to a multi-pad clutch plate versus a standard continuous pad clutch?

Keith's and my Sentra needs a new clutch, but we also need more pressure on the clutch since we have the welded diff.
We could go with traditional clutch and HD pressure plate that claims 50% more pressure and 211 ft/lb torque rating
There is also a 4 pad clutch and with pressure plate with same rating.

Can someone explain pro/cons of both?

_________________
"Ruttin' is racing"

Chris Suich
Apex, NC
AutoX 2012 Nissan Leaf (Quietly changing the world)
AutoX 2003 Mini Cooper S (on sabbatical)
RallyX 1993 Nissan Sentra - "Le Tigre"
FunX 1970 Camaro LT1 ('95)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: multi pad clutches versus continuous pad
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
The Giver
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:45 am
Posts: 4566
Location: Bashing BMWs!
ChrisSuich wrote:
Is there any advantage to a multi-pad clutch plate versus a standard continuous pad clutch?

Keith's and my Sentra needs a new clutch, but we also need more pressure on the clutch since we have the welded diff.
We could go with traditional clutch and HD pressure plate that claims 50% more pressure and 211 ft/lb torque rating
There is also a 4 pad clutch and with pressure plate with same rating.

Can someone explain pro/cons of both?


You are describing a "puck clutch" and NO, you don't want one. Puck clutches are for drag racing.

_________________
Vincent Keene
'06 Ford Mustang GT (track rat)
'15 Dodge Charger R/T (yeah, it's got a HEMI!)
'07 Ford Fusion SE (205,000 miles and counting)
'98 Chevy Z-24 (retired)
'93 Acura Integra (Team SWB 24HOL Car)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:09 pm 
Offline
Pseudo cautious/nervous guy

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:05 am
Posts: 733
Location: Rockville, MD
From a drivability persperspective, the puck clutches engage RIGHT NOW. They are not linear at all. Very digital.

The fewer pucks, the more "right now" the engagement. With more pucks, the engagement becomes more linear.

_________________
Tom Freeman
'98 M3/4/5 | '93 Spec3 325i | '12 TSX sport wagon | '03 Tahoe
Team Silver Bullets '91 240SX


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 587
Location: Apex, NC
Well that explains why our clutch failed at the last RallyX event

"Drag Race Rallycross"

Because we didn't have a puck clutch!

Walter, how many more RallyX's are you chairing? :lol:


Thanks for the explanations.

_________________
"Ruttin' is racing"

Chris Suich
Apex, NC
AutoX 2012 Nissan Leaf (Quietly changing the world)
AutoX 2003 Mini Cooper S (on sabbatical)
RallyX 1993 Nissan Sentra - "Le Tigre"
FunX 1970 Camaro LT1 ('95)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:50 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
Yeah, puck clutches really suck. You could also consider something with more exotic pad material that doesn't have a stiffer pressure plate. That is what I put in the Miata for its supercharged days and it has held up great. Chatter's a little once in awhile though.

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:25 pm
Posts: 770
Location: Greenville, NC
ChrisSuich wrote:
Well that explains why our clutch failed at the last RallyX event

"Drag Race Rallycross"

Because we didn't have a puck clutch!

Walter, how many more RallyX's are you chairing? :lol:

javascript:emoticon(':lol:')
Thanks for the explanations.


As many as possible and whenever we can start uphill! :lol:
I have used the puck style friction plates in my Camaro. Driveability is a problem especially with a lightweight flywheel.

I'd suggest a high performance clutch and a Kevlar friction plate. With your welded diff you can launch harder and you need more pressure on the friction plate. Then, you need a more durable friction plate. Before you could dump the clutch and were only spinning one wheel. Now you have double your traction and stress on the clutch.

In most racing situations stock clutches are a weak link. Get a high performance clutch and start breaking something else!!! My guess will be an axle or something inside the transmission.

_________________
Rubbin' is Racin'


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group