⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:12 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Volvo's R line may return
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:50 pm 
Offline
Only YOU can prevent forest fires
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 9:58 pm
Posts: 2204
Location: Apex
Volvo Considering R Performance Range Revival

Image

There’s no denying the last few years have been tough on Volvo and as such, performance cars haven’t exactly been what you’d call a priority. Ford Motor Company’s move to offload its European portfolio and the admission that its Swedish marque was on the block coupled with an economic downturn left Gothenburg in a precarious position where even mainstream product development was delayed. Stalwarts such as the XC90 have gone long in the tooth by today’s industry production cycle standards. R cars, momentarily gone from the lineup, have been replaced by “R design” optics packages that look the part though don’t offer any real performance gains. As a result, Volvo's enthusiast ownership has shrunken. Given the context, we were encouraged recently when Volvo Cars North America boss Doug Speck suggested there could be a return of R-branded cars in addition to the already well known intention of adding diesel and hybrid models.

The idea behind a performance line like Volvo R, BMW M or Mercedes-Benz AMG is image – a halo offering that inspires excitement and loyalty from owners but not huge profits. These cars are expensive to produce and sell in low numbers. When times are tough or numbers driven, non-enthusiast executives are in power, halo cars are the first cars to get the axe and that’s entirely what happened to the S60R and V70R. Unfortunately, it is the influential consumer group who purchases these vehicles that is most proud of their cars and a brand's biggest proponents to friends and family. Ignoring these customers sends Volvo's most influential prospective owners off to other brands who cater to enthusiasts – BMW, Audi, Mercedes-Benz, or one of many other competitors. Even Cadillac, mostly known for limousines and fluffy traditional luxury, has recognized this and added its new world-class V-series cars.

Image

Volvo’s prior design chief, Steve Mattin, once told us that the German culture is more about driving fast. It was his contention that Volvo would win customers by continuing its safety lead and raising its design to also be a differentiator. That’s a noble goal, but in our opinion it is not very realistic when competitors such as BMW, Audi, Cadillac, Jaguar, Alfa Romeo and more are all at the top of their respective design games. Further, we believe that those who place a high priority on safety and Swedish design are not so one dimensional that they don’t yearn for a degree of high performance as well – “safe sex” as outspoken ex-VCNA president Vic Doolan once termed it.

Image

It’s important to note that Volvo’s R-branded history. R-sport products were solely accessories in the ‘70s. The first R-branded 850s didn’t arrive until halfway through the ‘90s. Rs based on the 850 and the first-generation S70/V70 that replaced them were a simple formula – bigger chin spoiler, bigger wheels, sport suspension and a more aggressive ECU to more cost-effectively raise power and torque noticeably more than standard models. Other than that, a few interior upgrades were the only other cues.

Image

In the era of the P2-generation S60R and V70R, Volvo was in a haughty mood. Its products were hot sellers laden with new technologies like Haldex AWD. Developing this generation of R-car was much more extensive, with a thoroughly reworked engine, push-button adjustable 4C suspension dynamics, Brembo brakes, body changes front and rear and lavish R-specific leather interiors with spaceball shifters for manual transmission cars. These were the most capable R-cars ever built, but costs rose and likely profitability wasn’t great. Eventually the Rs disappeared despite the fact that S60 production continued.


It’s not that we didn’t love the P2 R cars, but we see that they were too aggressive a step for a brand where high-performance is a lower priority than with the Germans. However, we think the first R-cars may have been onto something – mildly hotter cars that are both enough to coax mainstream customers with a little bit of flair and provide a solid foundation for the more hardcore who will modify and upgrade anything to their needs anyway. As icons like the BMW M3 move up market to the even more extreme, medium-level performers such as the repositioned Audi S4 and the turbocharged BMW 335i are enjoying a renaissance by offering just enough performance at a much more attractive price.

Image

All things considered, we believe Volvo should take a step backward as it considers a next generation of R cars. The new S60 looks like an excellent basis on which to begin. Figure any R-design package planned or existing would be fine for a true R. Take a page from Audi’s book where they use their S-line appearance kit with a different grille on the S4. Scrap 4C or make it optional and, if anything, spend that money adding Haldex’s great XWD system that controls torque at the rear wheels for added stability and even oversteer. Engine and interior upgrades are easy -- a more aggressively tuned T6 and maybe some Alcantara segmentation on the seats would be perfect. Maybe bring back the S60R’s Brembos or offer them as a port or dealer-installed accessory. A manual gearbox is a must while Geartronic cars should definitely get wheel-mounted paddle controllers. Many of the components—brakes, tuning programs, wheels, and interior accessories—could even be shared between a number of models to bring costs down. And who wouldn’t want R versions of the C30, S40, and V50 or even XC60 along with the S60 and V60?

Image

Our rendered image speculation of an S60R sticks to the proposed formula. We’ve guessed at what the R-design kit will look like, emphasizing larger openings for aftermarket upgraded intercoolers and improved airflow. Wheels are straight off of the XC60 R-design, but with centers painted a cool matte finish like Volvo is already doing to some of its own accessory wheels. For badges, we’ve done something a little more unique than the simple chrome R-script, instead favoring fender-mounted crown badges with a Swedish feel that harken back to Volvo badges of the ‘70s without being overly retro.

As Volvo sits on the precipice of a new era, we certainly hope for careful reconsideration of R models. Such cars will not necessarily rewrite the books from a volume perspective, but this sort of halo vehicle is candy for the faithful enthusiasts who eat, drink and breathe Volvo. We speak for them when we say we’d all collectively recommend Volvo that much more to friends and family were Gothenburg to bait us with such an offering.

_________________
Marty Howard
2011 NASA SE Factory Five Challenge Champion
Track Events Logistics Coordinator - TZC/THSCC
2007 Factory Five Challenge Car.
http://www.mh-motorsports.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:16 pm 
Offline
Tire Nerd
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:40 pm
Posts: 1818
Location: Greenville, SC
As an original owner of an 850R (which we still have) and two-time owner of the latest V70R, I'm done with Volvo for good. Maybe the Chinese can help them out now, but I'll never purchase another of their products. The Ford/Volvo hook-up was a disaster for Volvo imo.

I had a great conversation on the phone 6 years back with Hans Nilsson (the "R" chief engineer/racer dude), and through my questions and such I got a good understanding of all of the compromises made, etc. He seemed like a pretty decent guy and all, but I left the call more perplexed and disappointed than I was prior. This was arranged through a contact at Volvo NA who thought my input to Hans would be useful to Volvo at the time. I think Hans and I agreed on a lot of things but that Volvo corp and Hans didn't. :wink: I wonder if he's still there...

_________________
Current stable:
2019 BMW M2 Competition slicktop 6MT
2011 BMW M3 sedan slicktop 6MT
2007 BMW 328i wagon (slushbox for now)
1975 CanAm 125MX2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 510
Location: Raleigh, NC
As a new owner of an 850 Turbo Wagon, it's a bit sad what has happened to Volvo since then. The specs of our wagon are on par or better than many of the newer models.

_________________
2003 Subaru WRX Sportwagon = daily driver/boost and booster seats
2000 BMW 540iT = wife's kid hauler
2012 Toyota Highlander = the boring reliable vehicle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:06 pm 
Offline
Stalker's boyfriend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:35 pm
Posts: 2858
Location: Looking for Chuck on the Intraweb
Chris Halweg wrote:
As a new owner of an 850 Turbo Wagon, it's a bit sad what has happened to Volvo since then. The specs of our wagon are on par or better than many of the newer models.


Chris, I have a '94 850 Turbo Wagon as well. I have replaced more on this car than I care to mention, but I still like it. It will probably get sold when I buy a new car in the spring, but like Chuck, I will never own another Volvo, even though I love the functionality. - AB

_________________
'14 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 4WD
Super Westerfield Bros - '93 Integra - LeChump Du Jour
STX 93 - Scion FR-S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:33 pm 
Offline
Only YOU can prevent forest fires
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 9:58 pm
Posts: 2204
Location: Apex
somehow I knew Chuck would respond.

_________________
Marty Howard
2011 NASA SE Factory Five Challenge Champion
Track Events Logistics Coordinator - TZC/THSCC
2007 Factory Five Challenge Car.
http://www.mh-motorsports.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:18 pm 
Offline
Tire Nerd
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:40 pm
Posts: 1818
Location: Greenville, SC
Marty Howard wrote:
somehow I knew Chuck would respond.


Yep, the multi-ten-thousand sting still hasn't healed. :D

_________________
Current stable:
2019 BMW M2 Competition slicktop 6MT
2011 BMW M3 sedan slicktop 6MT
2007 BMW 328i wagon (slushbox for now)
1975 CanAm 125MX2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 510
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aaron Buckley wrote:
Chris Halweg wrote:
As a new owner of an 850 Turbo Wagon, it's a bit sad what has happened to Volvo since then. The specs of our wagon are on par or better than many of the newer models.


Chris, I have a '94 850 Turbo Wagon as well. I have replaced more on this car than I care to mention, but I still like it. It will probably get sold when I buy a new car in the spring, but like Chuck, I will never own another Volvo, even though I love the functionality. - AB


I've begun the process of replacing parts as well to get it back to daily driving condition. Worst case scenario is that it just becomes a utility vehicle for hauling etc. if all does not go to plan.

_________________
2003 Subaru WRX Sportwagon = daily driver/boost and booster seats
2000 BMW 540iT = wife's kid hauler
2012 Toyota Highlander = the boring reliable vehicle


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group