Marty Howard wrote:
However, it is unclear if the production versions will feature this expensive change. One of the issues in sloping back the windscreen like this is the effect on the car’s performance in US crash tests. These have to cater for unbelted occupants because wearing a seatbelt is still not compulsory in many US states.
I had a problem with the seat belt thing not being compulsory, so I looked it up. Turns out ONLY New Hampshire has no seat belt law for front seat passengers. That's all that would affect this car, right? (I'm not going back to check, but it didn't appear it could have rear seats.) If so, do you mean we might all have to pay the price because ONE state doesn't have a seat belt law?
I know NH is the "live free or die" state, but I thought the feds did a pretty good job with their road money withholding threats that all states had complied. Anyone know the real story there?
--Donnie