Solar wasn't an option when I realized I liked having my house in the trees and not in the middle of a field. Trees are good. Bulldozing houses with wild abandon to put up a field of houses with barely any room for grass, let alone replanting trees is bad. If you can say there are any good side effects from this current economic situation it is that we will stop doing that for a few years, anyway.
Of course, I also live in an area where the trees are really big, too. Some areas of the state you could be living mostly in the trees and still make use of solar on the house.
Oh, and while the solar farm at SAS is neat, what's the carbon trade-off on what the trees could have cleaned versus what the solar power offsets from not having to burn something to produce that same electricity? Sure, I could see putting solar on top of things that already preclude having trees there (like rooftops), but clearing a big area for it? I can't really get behind that.
Oh, and I'm no tree-hugger. I believe that not only having trees is good, but farming trees is better. I particularly like
this article about the topic.
--Donnie