Ryan Holton wrote:
Answer me this, you filled up all your cars yesterday because of the reports. If the price would have stayed at ~$2.50/gal and been froze there but it was reported that the next delivery of fuel is unknown. Would you have filled all your gas cans up? Maybe go to Wal Mart and buy a few more gas cans and fill 'em up too? This would have happened until there was ZERO supply. Again, IMHO.
I filled them up yesterday because of what I perceive as a situation that will not just clear up in a week or so. I already had 3/4 of a tank. So no I didn't run off to Wally World and get 50 gas cans and fill them all. Since I'm out of town until next Wednesday I saw it as prudent to gas up now because of a supply issue, not price issue.
The lower income people who can barely afford a beater to get to work though are taking it a lot harder. Middle income and above people are just bitching about the price. I still think a price control and gallon limit should have been established to try and spread remaining fuel around. Instead of it getting used for boaters, people who have these car hobbies, etc...
Supply and demand is practical most of the time. Not all of the time and certainly not in a disaster situation. So if you think that resembles Communism then so be it. I see it as a rational approach to balancing a needed commodity in a bad situation. A situation where simply asking the population to all play nice together isn't going to happen.