⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:11 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:30 pm 
Offline
Sponsored by Wal Mart!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 687
Location: Making a mongrel
Jason Mauldin wrote:
Quote:
The gas station owners had already determined the price of the gas.

Prices are fluctuating hourly. Until that stops, they haven't determined what a fair price should be.
The price that they had before the shortage announced was fair enough for them to sell it at that. Why all of a sudden is it not fair now?

Jason Mauldin wrote:
Quote:
Mike Whitney wrote:
Hey Rich -- I largely agree with you in principle but not in practice. I can't believe no one has found the obvious flaw with an idea like Easley capping gas prices:

If NC capped gas price but all our neighboring states have much higher prices, there is strong incentive for all the gas companies to sell gas elsewhere and short-change "low profit NC". It would happen, and it would make any shortage even worse.
Incorrect. As I stated in the beginning, the freeze would be lifted immediately that supply was restored.

And what about the condition where the pipeline is partially restored? That report shows they are at 25%, with 100% "expected" tonight. Mike is right, that 25% has to be rationed by the oil company. If we're paying $3/gal in NC and GA is willing to pay $6, who is going to get that gas? Should the federal government step in and rationalize it at that point?
When they can supply gas, we allow the supply and demand system to work. If the prices go up because there is only one quarter the gas available, that is how the system is supposed to work.

_________________
Rich
http://www.v8mongrel.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:32 pm 
Offline
Rookie phenom
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Posts: 1792
Location: Raleigh, NC
I don't think Easley nor the state government could do any thing other than asking people to conserve, like he did in yesterday's press release. They do not have the power to set prices.

If you set the price lower than what the station(s) paid for it, they will shut down the pumps. One report states that some stations are shutting down pumps cause they can not afford the current price and are willing to wait it out. If you can get a tanker full at $3 a gallon and then can only sell it for $2.99 over the course of the next week...you can lose a lot of money. And these mom and pop stations do not run on big margains.

See, setting a price is not easy. You can tell the station what number to post, but you can not control the price downstream. Only the federal government can control interstate commerce. Would you buy a $3 product when you can only sell it for $2.50?

_________________
Jim Pastorius
2008 Silverado VortecMax
1992 Camaro CMC#92
2002 BMW R1150R

2009 3rd Place CMC Mid-Atlantic Championship
2009 CMC Hyperfest Winner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:59 pm 
Offline
Badass

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 10:24 am
Posts: 494
FWIW, the highest price I've seen in Hillsborough is 3.79 for regular. The other stations range from $3.09 to $3.19.

Anonymous Government Flunkie :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:07 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
Rich Anderson wrote:
Jason Mauldin wrote:
Quote:
The gas station owners had already determined the price of the gas.

Prices are fluctuating hourly. Until that stops, they haven't determined what a fair price should be.
The price that they had before the shortage announced was fair enough for them to sell it at that. Why all of a sudden is it not fair now?

Jason Mauldin wrote:
Quote:
Mike Whitney wrote:
Hey Rich -- I largely agree with you in principle but not in practice. I can't believe no one has found the obvious flaw with an idea like Easley capping gas prices:

If NC capped gas price but all our neighboring states have much higher prices, there is strong incentive for all the gas companies to sell gas elsewhere and short-change "low profit NC". It would happen, and it would make any shortage even worse.
Incorrect. As I stated in the beginning, the freeze would be lifted immediately that supply was restored.

And what about the condition where the pipeline is partially restored? That report shows they are at 25%, with 100% "expected" tonight. Mike is right, that 25% has to be rationed by the oil company. If we're paying $3/gal in NC and GA is willing to pay $6, who is going to get that gas? Should the federal government step in and rationalize it at that point?
When they can supply gas, we allow the supply and demand system to work. If the prices go up because there is only one quarter the gas available, that is how the system is supposed to work.


Am, I confused, or did you just contradict yourself in the same post???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:26 pm 
Offline
Sponsored by Wal Mart!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 687
Location: Making a mongrel
Les Davis wrote:
Rich Anderson wrote:
Jason Mauldin wrote:
Quote:
The gas station owners had already determined the price of the gas.

Prices are fluctuating hourly. Until that stops, they haven't determined what a fair price should be.
The price that they had before the shortage announced was fair enough for them to sell it at that. Why all of a sudden is it not fair now?

Jason Mauldin wrote:
Quote:
Mike Whitney wrote:
Hey Rich -- I largely agree with you in principle but not in practice. I can't believe no one has found the obvious flaw with an idea like Easley capping gas prices:

If NC capped gas price but all our neighboring states have much higher prices, there is strong incentive for all the gas companies to sell gas elsewhere and short-change "low profit NC". It would happen, and it would make any shortage even worse.
Incorrect. As I stated in the beginning, the freeze would be lifted immediately that supply was restored.

And what about the condition where the pipeline is partially restored? That report shows they are at 25%, with 100% "expected" tonight. Mike is right, that 25% has to be rationed by the oil company. If we're paying $3/gal in NC and GA is willing to pay $6, who is going to get that gas? Should the federal government step in and rationalize it at that point?
When they can supply gas, we allow the supply and demand system to work. If the prices go up because there is only one quarter the gas available, that is how the system is supposed to work.


Am, I confused, or did you just contradict yourself in the same post???
Yup, you are confused. :wink: :P When there was no renewable supply and there was no known schedule for resupply, there was a external influence that changed the system. If there is a supply, even if it is smaller than before, then the market system can work. However, if a hurricane causes an artificial scarcity on a product and destoys the possibility for replenishment in the short term, there is not reason that the temporary finite supply shoule be allowed to have a large economic impact. That makes no sense. Why allow a small supply blip to exert influence on multiple sectors of the economy. Now, as Jim pointed out, they may not have been able to do anything. However, I still believe that the impending calamity announcement made more than 48 hours after a regular guy like me had info that this was more likely than not to be a problem is just pathetic.

_________________
Rich
http://www.v8mongrel.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:32 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
So the solution is careful government monitoring of every situation, and when the butterfly took off from the coast of Africa starting up this hurricane, the governor should have have had his Petroleum Task Force Delta at the ready to smack down any attempted price adjustment according to the supply that may or may not be at the Sheetz in Wilmington. Gotcha.

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:33 pm 
Offline
Sponsored by Wal Mart!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 687
Location: Making a mongrel
jimpastorius wrote:
I don't think Easley nor the state government could do any thing other than asking people to conserve, like he did in yesterday's press release. They do not have the power to set prices.

If you set the price lower than what the station(s) paid for it, they will shut down the pumps. One report states that some stations are shutting down pumps cause they can not afford the current price and are willing to wait it out. If you can get a tanker full at $3 a gallon and then can only sell it for $2.99 over the course of the next week...you can lose a lot of money. And these mom and pop stations do not run on big margains.

See, setting a price is not easy. You can tell the station what number to post, but you can not control the price downstream. Only the federal government can control interstate commerce. Would you buy a $3 product when you can only sell it for $2.50?
Jim, I said that as soon as the gas supply returned, the price freeze would be lifted. If you get new gas, you are back on the usual system. The price freeze is just a way to mitigate the downstream effects of a temporary supply interruption. This is not a long term plan, not have I ever contended it was. Furthermore, this all could have been avoided if the govenor had actually shown a little foresight and said something earlier. I think that if on Monday people had been told that there was plenty of gas for the next few days, but conservation efforts would have to be put in place because the effects of the hurricane could not be determined, there would have been a lot less of a panic reaction, and in fact, even in my view, no need for a price freeze.

_________________
Rich
http://www.v8mongrel.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:35 pm 
Offline
Sponsored by Wal Mart!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 687
Location: Making a mongrel
Wes Eargle wrote:
So the solution is careful government monitoring of every situation, and when the butterfly took off from the coast of Africa starting up this hurricane, the governor should have have had his Petroleum Task Force Delta at the ready to smack down any attempted price adjustment according to the supply that may or may not be at the Sheetz in Wilmington. Gotcha.
Yup. Perfect synopsis. While he is at it, I think he should invent an alternate fuel source so this is all a moot point.

_________________
Rich
http://www.v8mongrel.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:41 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
I think that Mr. T has a better chance discovering that he has earned the Nobel Prize for Chemistry on the back porch of my house eating ribs and drinking a 40 than that ever happening.

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:43 pm 
Offline
Sponsored by Wal Mart!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 687
Location: Making a mongrel
Wes Eargle wrote:
I think that Mr. T has a better chance discovering that he has earned the Nobel Prize for Chemistry on the back porch of my house eating ribs than that ever happening.
The government doing the right thing in any situation seems to have worse odds than that. This whole situation is pretty disheartening, IMO.

_________________
Rich
http://www.v8mongrel.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Why a higher price?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 12:31 pm
Posts: 535
Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC
The price at the pump is controlled by the station owner.
The owner's price is controlled by the distributor.
The distributor's price is set by the terminal operator.
The terminal's price is set by the refinery.

So...

With the huge stockpiles of crude, and refined gasoline, diesel, kerosene, etc. at the tank farms near the refineries, which were contracted for, purchased and stored MONTHS AGO, why, all of a sudden, does this merchandise miraculously gain 50% or more in value overnight?

Supply vs. demand controls the market price on most commodities, but to brazenly jack up the price of what really is amounts to a public necessity in order to create exhorbitant profits at the expense of the general public is criminal. Remember the Enron electricity gambit in California?

Of course, with all the additional money available to the politicians, we shouldn't expect ol' Dubya's crowd to do anything but wring their hands and claim there's nothing they can do.

Your government hard at work. :x

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why a higher price?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 6:58 pm 
Offline
Sponsored by Wal Mart!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 687
Location: Making a mongrel
Brad Mackey wrote:
The price at the pump is controlled by the station owner.
The owner's price is controlled by the distributor.
The distributor's price is set by the terminal operator.
The terminal's price is set by the refinery.

So...

With the huge stockpiles of crude, and refined gasoline, diesel, kerosene, etc. at the tank farms near the refineries, which were contracted for, purchased and stored MONTHS AGO, why, all of a sudden, does this merchandise miraculously gain 50% or more in value overnight?

Supply vs. demand controls the market price on most commodities, but to brazenly jack up the price of what really is amounts to a public necessity in order to create exhorbitant profits at the expense of the general public is criminal. Remember the Enron electricity gambit in California?
Quiet. You cannot suggest that the government should ever intervene in the economy on behalf of the public good. The Club UnAmerican Activities Committee will come and get you! You have Red in your avatar, so they are already watching you! :lol:

_________________
Rich
http://www.v8mongrel.com/


Last edited by Rich Anderson on Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why a higher price?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:50 pm 
Offline
proud papa!!1!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 6:44 pm
Posts: 2842
Location: Durham
Brad Mackey wrote:
Your government hard at work. :x


At least they have the time to think about helping the folks in Louisiana and Mississippi. If those folks are lucky, the government will finish thinking soon and start acting. We're a week into this deal, and just now we're starting to see a mobilization of efforts?

This was a very forseeable catastrophy (New Orleans), yet, it's been public policy for quite some time to turn a blind eye.

Thank goodness we have all those spare National Guard troops guarding the nation of Iraq... Thank God hindsight is 20/20 or else we'd be blind all the time!

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:51 pm 
Offline
Not spectacular just decent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 5:12 pm
Posts: 1213
Location: Heading back to base for debriefing and cocktails.
Rich Anderson wrote:
However, I still believe that the impending calamity announcement made more than 48 hours after a regular guy like me had info that this was more likely than not to be a problem is just pathetic.


Why is this funny to me?

_________________
Not spectacular just decent.
I'm not sure what I'm driving.
Maybe an ITR in DS.
Or half-assed STX prepped 330.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why a higher price?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:33 pm 
Offline
Republican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 4356
Location: MWI/MUI Kubota FTW
scottjohnson wrote:
Brad Mackey wrote:
Your government hard at work. :x


At least they have the time to think about helping the folks in Louisiana and Mississippi. If those folks are lucky, the government will finish thinking soon and start acting. We're a week into this deal, and just now we're starting to see a mobilization of efforts?

This was a very forseeable catastrophy (New Orleans), yet, it's been public policy for quite some time to turn a blind eye.

Thank goodness we have all those spare National Guard troops guarding the nation of Iraq... Thank God hindsight is 20/20 or else we'd be blind all the time!

Scott


indeed Scott, i was just saying the same thing this evening. isn't it odd the Gaurd has not been more prominent in the relief effort. then it occurred to me too, we don't have a gaurd anymore. or at least not at home. i was listening to msnbc on the radio this evening and it is unbelievable what is occuring in new orleans. but then maybe that is just the liberal media trashing the administration again.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group