Jonathan Rodriguez wrote:
Why are you guys so pleased with Subaru? Sounds like they have the same attitude as Mitsu...
Exactly. I think that Mitsubishi is currently nearly down for the count and due to cost saving pressure they are probably enforcing this slightly more than Subaru, Porsche, etc. currently does. Don’t we hear stories like this from Subaru sometimes? All it may take is a single manufacture to start enforcing this and it could start the ball rolling for the others.
Matt Graham wrote:
As stated in the post/article, this sort of thing is totally dependent on the service writer/technician.
Ok, totally based upon the original Mitsubishi story that was published elsewhere on the web (not the Autoweek article) the guy showed up at the dealer and found out that his warrantee had already been "tagged". I was also under the impression that he had not been in for warrantee work before (i.e. there was a history of abuse). Who knows for sure, but it sounds like this was done at a level higher than the dealership (i.e. the mythical corporate spies that review public autocross results). So, MAYBE no matter how good your relationship is with the dealer, if those higher up than the dealers decide to follow the warrantee to the letter, then you might be in trouble.
Overall, I agree that the "wink wink, nudge nudge" stuff has to stop. Don't produce "performance" cars, market them based upon their heritage, offer free membership to clubs that promote warrantee voiding activities. If they want people to act/drive like "posers", then just sell the cars with anemic 90 HP engines vs something with real power.
_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.comMoney can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.