Richard Casto wrote:
I totally understand what you are saying. I think the problem is that to a degree images like the ones in question are a bit of a Rorschach test. Some see what you see and others don't. I think what is hard is that you are seeing a boat and I see a train and that you feel supremely confident that boat is not just the right answer, but the only answer, while I feel that both are valid answers.
I have a strong sense of right and wrong, but I also have a strong sense that the world is full of grey and that trying to fit every scenario into a tidy box is just not going to work. I am having a hard time shoving those photos into the "wrong" box as if there are only two boxes to pick from.
Richard
Well several women have come up and have stated that the pictures being posted are offensive to them, and the response has mostly been "shut up and deal with it". I fully realize that the world is full of grey areas and nothing is black and white; however, the response to this whole ordeal has been "shut up and deal with it", especially when it comes to the few women we have in the club.
I think you're coming at this from the wrong angle. You can correct me if I'm wrong, but from my perspective you're trying to assign equal fault to both parties at that the truth is in the middle; which it isn't. Having those pictures up, which are offensive to a nonzero number of people, creates a hostile environment where not everyone is feeling welcomed. Like I said earlier, it would be one thing if half of the posts weren't "things were way better in the past before all of these uppity PC idiots got all offended", but that's the reality of the situation.
Jason Mauldin wrote:
This isn't as black and white as you make it out to be.
You have made a direct correlation between objectification and equality.
I believe that women have more equality now than they have ever had. (I am not saying that it is 100%)
I also believe that society objectifies women (and men) more so now than it ever has in the past. Listen to Top 40 music or watch a popular TV show for many examples of this.
Regardless, my contention is with censoring the viewpoints of others. Which you clearly have no problem with. You are okay listening to others, as long as it fits within some set of boundaries that you are comfortable with.
This isn't about censoring. There's also an endless amount of irony of someone from a socioeconomic place of privilege whining about censorship. No one is being silenced. It's just like people assuming that the First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, also includes Freedom from Consequences of said Freedom of Speech.
Yeah, women do have a greater amount of equality now, but please keep in mind that it's only a very recent phenomena: women have only had the right to vote in the US since 1920; it hasn't even been 100 years.
I don't necessarily agree with your assertion that objectification happens to both sexes with the same intensity or frequency. It does happen and there are interesting points to talk about unrealistic body proportions and expectations of men, but there's no contest when it comes to the sexualization and objectification of women in society.
Lastly, I know that I'm extremely brash and abrasive when it comes to talking about stuff online. I've had these types of discussions before and I know a lot of shorthand and shortcuts when it comes to people putting forth arguments. I try to dial it back a bit with people who I interact with in person, but I've read and heard some pretty vile stuff and I dismiss things that aren't germane to the topic at hand.
Empathizing is a difficult skill to have, yet it's really unfair to accuse another party of not being empathic/sympathetic to viewpoint that is insidious when it comes to overarching topics such as misogyny or racism.