⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:08 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 642
Location: Raleigh
Steven Carter wrote:
I'd be surprised you could fit in it though, Rodney. When I'm sitting in it my head almost touches the headliner!

Sorry for the thread derail....continue the daydreaming!


I had the same problem with mine until I discovered the spacers under the seat. I am 6'2" with short legs but after removing the spacers I had plenty of headroom.

_________________
92 Miata 1.9L naturally aspirated. SSM 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:50 am 
Offline
My stiffness is only an illusion
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:49 pm
Posts: 4658
Location: on line looking at car ads
Jordan Normark wrote:
The 240z is one of the select few cars I have had that I would buy again. It had more "character" in it's knock off SU carbs, their choke lever and sweet singing inline 6 than any other car I have owned...except of course the Miata :D

Per Bruce's bequeath:

Mid 60's lotus elan hard top (convertible looks weird with the top down and window frames on) and a spyder frame would be nice.
67 427 vette
94 ZR-1
c6 Zo-6
2000 sport package Miata
81 928s with LS-1
Spec Miata + plus spares
Late 60's early 70's Vista Cruiser to tow said Spec Miata


When I was in high school, my good friends aunt had a silver Vista Cruiser. I always did like those little narrow skylights over the rear cabin area.

_________________
Rodney

'08 Bullitt mustang, CAM 7
Autox VP '09-'10, President '11-'12, interim President 2nd half of ‘14
proud recipient of the Bowie Grey service award '12
Now just a guy driving a mustang....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:55 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
JamesShort wrote:
All I can say is I was generally as fast as you in a car that has less peak torque than your car idles at....on street tires [/rant]

Though you did remind me that I do want a 997 Carrera S (9A1 powered)...in white with black wheels.


I expected such a response, that and of course you could go somewhere down the route of big powerful cars being over compensation for lacking in other "things" blah... blah... blah... :D

My response to you:

1. Life isn't all about autocross timer results.

2. Autocross times are not all about peak torque or horsepower, not even close, that's called drag racing, would you like to drag race my Corvette with your Honduh? I think not. Autocross is about momentum maintenance regardless if your driving a 90 hp Civic or a fire breathing 500 hp Corvette, its still mostly just momentum maintenance. Having a great deal of horsepower can help when you've screwed up the momentum maintenance, but it can get you into just as much or more trouble than it can get you out of.

3. I've never claimed to be the greatest driver in the world, Tom Hoppe cured me of all such notions over a decade ago.

4. If your ultimate automotive fantasies result in a Honda Civic, I'm sincerely and deeply sorry. Very... very... very sorry. :P :D

Yes, I've had my ass handed to my by more Honduhs than I care to even remember over the years and I'm sure I will continue to do so for many years to come. In the end though, even when I'm getting it wrong and getting beat by a Honduh, I'm having more fun in my Corvette than I could in any Honduh this is because I stopped focusing so heavily on timer results a long time ago, sure I do care about timer results and like to get the FTD, but in the end its more about having fun and I derive fun from the sensory feast that is driving a beastly car "like I stole it" balancing that beast on that tricky edge between 9 and 11 tenths. It is a thrill that no factory based Honduh could ever reproduce. If all I cared about was beating Honduh's in autocross timer results, I'd plant my ass back in a Miata, I had vastly more autocross "success" in that secretary's car than I have ever had in any Corvette, but I'm having more *fun* now, that much is certain, well that is when the car doesn't break at least. :) My life is mostly about fulfilling my youthful fantasies. As a kid I dreamed of flogging the snot out of a loud and powerful sports car, autocross is just an means to an end for me to do that regularly that doesn't result in me being in jail, timer results are secondary to that and I have to check my ego at the registration table much of the time. Recently I purchased a sporty motorcycle and yesterday I installed a loud ass rip snorting exhaust on it, what glorious fun this thing is. :D It will probably result in my breaking my neck or going to jail, I'm afraid I feel it might be worth it... :shock: :D

Anyway, I would think that the "Uncle Bruce" exercise and others like it would be more an exercise along those lines, exploring ultimate fantasies, hence why I gave you grief. But yeah, enjoy those 6 Civics of yours, you could drive a different Civic almost every day of the week. Oh Joy!!! :D

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:00 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
I am sorry, I just have to say this even if it sounds like you wound me up (you haven't). This is more of a personal pet peeve than anything.

:soap:

So I agree pretty much with what you said. But, when someone is communicating a point or idea and they use non-friendly terminology (spelling "Honda" as "Honduh", or "Microsoft" as "Micro$oft"), I quickly change how I view what they are saying from "they might have a good point" to they have an axe to grind and are unable to make a logical argument without name calling. In short, I am highly likely to ignore them and/or their argument. Slandering your audience never helps you make your point.

Richard

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:53 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Sorry more of this... ;)

:soap:

High HP vs. low HP autocrossing I generally agree with Les' points, but I he also miss some points about the difference. As thrilling as something like a Corvette can be, I am not going to argue that it is going to be more thrilling for everyone. I think that even you will agree that something like a Corvette is not going to be close to 100% of it's overall ability in a typical autocross course. For example you have to modulate throttle levels much more than a low HP/low torque car. And that also makes it harder to drive to the maximum. But... I think that there is also a thrill to driving a car much closer to all of it's absolute limits (traction, braking and power) for a high percentage of time. So in your "drive it like you stole it" comment, I would put forth the hypothesis that you are more likely to have that experience in a low HP/low torque car at an autocross than you will with something like a Corvette (assuming you are trying to drive both in a competitive manner).

Now things are going to be reversed on something like the open road or track.

Richard

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:07 pm 
Offline
My stiffness is only an illusion
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:49 pm
Posts: 4658
Location: on line looking at car ads
I think Les was just wearing his Remchek shirt today. I wouldn't put much stock in the rant....

Now, getting back to focus on what uncle Ralph had offered up, I'm still having a hard time finding the uber car since we're only allowed to buy 1 out of production car. Since no money limit was implied, I'm leaning heavily towards a DB5, but man, a well sorted Duesenberg would rock. I could see myself in this....

Image

_________________
Rodney

'08 Bullitt mustang, CAM 7
Autox VP '09-'10, President '11-'12, interim President 2nd half of ‘14
proud recipient of the Bowie Grey service award '12
Now just a guy driving a mustang....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
Les Davis wrote:
JamesShort wrote:
All I can say is I was generally as fast as you in a car that has less peak torque than your car idles at....on street tires [/rant]

Though you did remind me that I do want a 997 Carrera S (9A1 powered)...in white with black wheels.


I expected such a response, that and of course you could go somewhere down the route of big powerful cars being over compensation for lacking in other "things" blah... blah... blah... :D

My response to you:

1. Life isn't all about autocross timer results.

2. Autocross times are not all about peak torque or horsepower, not even close, that's called drag racing, would you like to drag race my Corvette with your Honduh? I think not. Autocross is about momentum maintenance regardless if your driving a 90 hp Civic or a fire breathing 500 hp Corvette, its still mostly just momentum maintenance. Having a great deal of horsepower can help when you've screwed up the momentum maintenance, but it can get you into just as much or more trouble than it can get you out of.

3. I've never claimed to be the greatest driver in the world, Tom Hoppe cured me of all such notions over a decade ago.

4. If your ultimate automotive fantasies result in a Honda Civic, I'm sincerely and deeply sorry. Very... very... very sorry. :P :D

Yes, I've had my ass handed to my by more Honduhs than I care to even remember over the years and I'm sure I will continue to do so for many years to come. In the end though, even when I'm getting it wrong and getting beat by a Honduh, I'm having more fun in my Corvette than I could in any Honduh this is because I stopped focusing so heavily on timer results a long time ago, sure I do care about timer results and like to get the FTD, but in the end its more about having fun and I derive fun from the sensory feast that is driving a beastly car "like I stole it" balancing that beast on that tricky edge between 9 and 11 tenths. It is a thrill that no factory based Honduh could ever reproduce. If all I cared about was beating Honduh's in autocross timer results, I'd plant my ass back in a Miata, I had vastly more autocross "success" in that secretary's car than I have ever had in any Corvette, but I'm having more *fun* now, that much is certain, well that is when the car doesn't break at least. :) My life is mostly about fulfilling my youthful fantasies. As a kid I dreamed of flogging the snot out of a loud and powerful sports car, autocross is just an means to an end for me to do that regularly that doesn't result in me being in jail, timer results are secondary to that and I have to check my ego at the registration table much of the time. Recently I purchased a sporty motorcycle and yesterday I installed a loud ass rip snorting exhaust on it, what glorious fun this thing is. :D It will probably result in my breaking my neck or going to jail, I'm afraid I feel it might be worth it... :shock: :D

Anyway, I would think that the "Uncle Bruce" exercise and others like it would be more an exercise along those lines, exploring ultimate fantasies, hence why I gave you grief. But yeah, enjoy those 6 Civics of yours, you could drive a different Civic almost every day of the week. Oh Joy!!! :D
You mad bro

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:22 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
Richard Casto wrote:
I am sorry, I just have to say this even if it sounds like you wound me up (you haven't). This is more of a personal pet peeve than anything.

:soap:

So I agree pretty much with what you said. But, when someone is communicating a point or idea and they use non-friendly terminology (spelling "Honda" as "Honduh", or "Microsoft" as "Micro$oft"), I quickly change how I view what they are saying from "they might have a good point" to they have an axe to grind and are unable to make a logical argument without name calling. In short, I am highly likely to ignore them and/or their argument. Slandering your audience never helps you make your point.

Richard


I'm sorry, I think its fun. Personally I feel like if you can't look past those funny little jabs than you have taken your purchase decision entirely too seriously and are way to over sensitive. I own nothing that I take so seriously that I take offense to a mildly funny intentional misspelling of, for some its like they cherish some brand so much its sacrilege to dare and poke fun at it. Hell, I currently own one and have owned more Mustangs than anything I love Mustangs yet I will regularly refer to them as "Rustangs" and find most any funny intentional misspelling of the name fun. Feel free to make fun of Mustangs, Corvettes, Miatas, etc however you like you won't offend me, and feel free to ignore whatever I post, you won't offend me with that either.

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:44 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Les Davis wrote:
Richard Casto wrote:
I am sorry, I just have to say this even if it sounds like you wound me up (you haven't). This is more of a personal pet peeve than anything.

:soap:

So I agree pretty much with what you said. But, when someone is communicating a point or idea and they use non-friendly terminology (spelling "Honda" as "Honduh", or "Microsoft" as "Micro$oft"), I quickly change how I view what they are saying from "they might have a good point" to they have an axe to grind and are unable to make a logical argument without name calling. In short, I am highly likely to ignore them and/or their argument. Slandering your audience never helps you make your point.

Richard


I'm sorry, I think its fun. Personally I feel like if you can't look past those funny little jabs than you have taken your purchase decision entirely too seriously and are way to over sensitive. I own nothing that I take so seriously that I take offense to a mildly funny intentional misspelling of, for some its like they cherish some brand so much its sacrilege to dare and poke fun at it. Hell, I currently own one and have owned more Mustangs than anything I love Mustangs yet I will regularly refer to them as "Rustangs" and find most any funny intentional misspelling of the name fun. Feel free to make fun of Mustangs, Corvettes, Miatas, etc however you like you won't offend me, and feel free to ignore whatever I post, you won't offend me with that either.

I am sorry you feel that way. :( You make some other fine points in your posts, but I don't at all agree with the main thrust of your comments directly above at all. It has nothing to do with me taking your comments personally, or me taking myself too seriously. Sorry for derailing this fine thread.

Richard

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 2028
Location: Raleigh, NC
RodneyWright wrote:
I think Les was just wearing his Remchek shirt today. I wouldn't put much stock in the rant....

Now, getting back to focus on what uncle Ralph had offered up, I'm still having a hard time finding the uber car since we're only allowed to buy 1 out of production car. Since no money limit was implied, I'm leaning heavily towards a DB5, but man, a well sorted Duesenberg would rock. I could see myself in this.....


No doubt that would rock. I think you'd need three or four Uncle Bruces though....most of those cars are over $1m, right?

_________________
Steve Carter
1972 Datsun 240Z-- resto pics at http://picasaweb.google.com/srcartermd
2007 GPW Honda S2000-- STR 86


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:17 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
Richard Casto wrote:
High HP vs. low HP autocrossing I generally agree with Les' points, but I he also miss some points about the difference.


I'm sorry, how many high HP cars have you campaigned in autocross again Richard? Sorry man, but you expressed a pet peeve before and I'll express one now, Over the years I've heard a lot of people with narry a lick of experience in an high HP car try and pontificate about autocrossing a HP car.

Richard Casto wrote:
As thrilling as something like a Corvette can be, I am not going to argue that it is going to be more thrilling for everyone. I think that even you will agree that something like a Corvette is not going to be close to 100% of it's overall ability in a typical autocross course. For example you have to modulate throttle levels much more than a low HP/low torque car. And that also makes it harder to drive to the maximum. But... I think that there is also a thrill to driving a car much closer to all of it's absolute limits (traction, braking and power) for a high percentage of time.


I try to maximize 100% usage of all capabilities acceleration (obviously only in short spurts), cornering and braking of my car every time I autocross. I approach and frequently surpass the "traction, braking, and power" limits of my car constantly at autocross. What do you think I'm out there on a Sunday drive cruising around? I am trying with all my might and ability to maximize the use of the traction circle available to me just like everyone else out there whatever they are driving. I might not accelerate flat out all the time, but I am constantly trying use as much of the throttle as I possibly can. I might not approach the top speed of the car, but who does? Even Honduhs can go faster than 60. ;-)

You indicate an inkling of the the idea, but I'm not sure how it supports your point. With a high HP car yes, you must modulate the throttle a lot more, and yes it is a much harder overall task to approach the limits and use all the potential that is there, therein lies the challenge and the thrill. Hustling a long, wide, heavy and powerful car around an autocross course is a significantly more difficult task than a small low horsepower one. Its a more multidimensional task with more variables to process in a shorter period of time. You say you don't think that would be more thrilling for everyone, and I'm really not sure what to say to that other than I'm sorry I guess, same as I said before, that should be more thrilling for everyone. Yes there is thrill in driving a lower limited car close to its limits, but it is a thrill I got bored with pretty quickly, not to say I mastered it, that's the thing about performance driving anything, the minute you think you've mastered it is the minute someone better comes along to show you you haven't. My minute came early, I mentioned Tom Hoppe before, many of you know of him, and some may not as he hasn't been around in awhile. Tom was a friend and a housemate for a few years and an autocross co-driver for a few seasons. Tom won the national championship in STX and had a podium finish in One Lap of America. Tom consistently beat me by about an average of 1.5 seconds at every event we co-drove. I rode with him countless times trying to find that 1.5 seconds to little avail. Tom didn't necessarily do anything fundamentally different than me, he just did everything a little bit better. I eventually came to the conclusion that Tom was simply a better driver than me, it didn't matter how many evo schools I took, or events I went to, I could get better yes, but I would never eliminate that 1.5 second gap and win a national championship and trying to chase it would simply lead to a lot of expense and frustration so I decided to enjoy autocross my own way.

And I know I'm rambling on here, and I really hope I don't sound like Remchak, I promise I couldn't possibly be more sober than I am right now and I can't remember the last time I drank a Budweiser. :D

The realization I came to is I like cars first and motorsports second, kinda what I was trying to say before maybe that makes more sense? So rather than focusing entirely on driving a slow car to its absolute potential, likely fruitlessly, I was gonna own/build cars that I liked and could enjoy first, and use autocross to drive the snot out of them and enjoy them more second. Seemed at the time and still does seem like a more fun choice than owning "the car" for "the class" hopelessly trying to chase an national championship that was never gonna happen. The harsh reality is, just like most of us can't play professional basketball or be brain surgeons, most of us cannot put together that perfect autocross run all the time and win a national championship no matter how hard we try. And I don't mean to try and discourage people who want to go down that path or be derogatory towards those that have in the past, if that is what trips your trigger, go for it, but there is another way to enjoy cars and motorsport and a great deal of fun to be had "getting it wrong" in a fast car, particularly a fast car that you built.

Richard Casto wrote:
So in your "drive it like you stole it" comment, I would put forth the hypothesis that you are more likely to have that experience in a low HP/low torque car at an autocross than you will with something like a Corvette (assuming you are trying to drive both in a competitive manner).


Your hypothesis is invalid as I would never steal a Honduh. :D :wink:

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Last edited by Les Davis on Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:22 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
RodneyWright wrote:
I think Les was just wearing his Remchek shirt today. I wouldn't put much stock in the rant....
Now, getting back to focus on what uncle Ralph had offered up, I'm still having a hard time finding the uber car since we're only allowed to buy 1 out of production car. Since no money limit was implied, I'm leaning heavily towards a DB5, but man, a well sorted Duesenberg would rock. I could see myself in this....


Seriously, I didn't mean that as a rant at all more of a philosophical statement than anything and a jab back at James. Please do not compare me to Remchak, I'm really communicating poorly if I'm coming across as Remchak after a beer or 6. Sorry Steve, I do love ya man.

Any Rodney yes, a Duesy would totally rock, you could totally drift it. :)

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Last edited by Les Davis on Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:45 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
JamesShort wrote:
You mad bro


Yes, I'm furious. totally. :D My afternoon consisted of riding my newly exhausted raspy and loud 600 cc missle, um I mean motorcycle around the "neighborhood" taking the long way home after a doctors appointment I had. This was my route:

Attachment:
my cruise home.jpg


Three bridges over the intercoastal waterway with stunning views, girls in bikinis walking about. I'm not sure I even know what "mad" is any more. You S2000 guys think your 9000 rpm redlines are cool, try 12,000... inches away from your ummmm... private parts. :shock:


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:55 pm 
Offline
My stiffness is only an illusion
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:49 pm
Posts: 4658
Location: on line looking at car ads
@Les.... Now I can understand why you moved to FLA. Your ride home must have really sucked, hate it for you. So what bike did you buy? Pam says no bike, but I'm welcome to buy all the car parts I "need". Not all bad....

_________________
Rodney

'08 Bullitt mustang, CAM 7
Autox VP '09-'10, President '11-'12, interim President 2nd half of ‘14
proud recipient of the Bowie Grey service award '12
Now just a guy driving a mustang....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 642
Location: Raleigh
Sounds like Les is describing the bike in his sig, Suzuki Bandit. I remember when a friend of a friend bought a 1200 new 10 years ago. He described the feeling of lift on his body while doing 140mph down I-40 as a really strong man trying to rip him off the bike :shock:

_________________
92 Miata 1.9L naturally aspirated. SSM 21


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group