⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:06 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:33 pm 
Offline
I got a SUX2000!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 12:07 am
Posts: 2443
Location: In the garage, under a big old Mercedes
Here's something kind of off the wall: how about a diesel Mercedes? You can take advantage of the fact that resale value is not a strong point of late model MBs.

http://wilmington.craigslist.org/ctd/3977983072.html

_________________
Karl S.
2014 Baby, 2014 House, 2013 Ford Focus ST, 2013 BMW 328i, 1994 Mercedes E320
(Insert passive aggressive signature line here)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 2028
Location: Raleigh, NC
Les Davis wrote:
MikeWhitney wrote:
I get why fuel economy is important to the earth, and to politicians, and for our future. What I don't get is why people let it weigh so heavily on their micro level requirements. Emotional needs I guess.

Case in point: At 10,000 miles per year, the difference in fuel cost between 30 and 35 MPG is $178 a year or $14 a month. Peanuts compared to the car payment, insurance, or depreciation. I'm with Dick, buy what you want and look at everything from a TCO perspective.


This. Newish Mustang V8s make great daily drivers, torque kicks ass and the psyco-therapy provided by the sound of a V8 is quite a bargain at $200/year extra you spend on gas over a hybrid thing. Invest in yourself, screw the environments. :D


Interestingly, after a typical workday I want/need quiet. And maybe some music. I find myself becoming more and more introverted as I get older, so "recharging" in a quiet setting is important to me, especially with the family and all that goes with it waiting after work (practices, rehearsals, school functions, games etc). Can't disagree with you on the engine sounds being enjoyable, and I hear torque is nice too! For now, the S2000 meets half of that....

_________________
Steve Carter
1972 Datsun 240Z-- resto pics at http://picasaweb.google.com/srcartermd
2007 GPW Honda S2000-- STR 86


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 2028
Location: Raleigh, NC
Karl Shultz wrote:
Here's something kind of off the wall: how about a diesel Mercedes? You can take advantage of the fact that resale value is not a strong point of late model MBs.

http://wilmington.craigslist.org/ctd/3977983072.html


Thanks for pointing that out, Karl! I was under the impression that everything post-W124 was unreliable and uber-expensive to repair out-of-warranty, so I had not included them on the list. Do you think that era of C or E-class is reliable? What are the weaknesses/failure points of that version of E-Class? Certainly ergonomics and NVH engineering are probably its strong suit.

_________________
Steve Carter
1972 Datsun 240Z-- resto pics at http://picasaweb.google.com/srcartermd
2007 GPW Honda S2000-- STR 86


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:43 pm 
Offline
My stiffness is only an illusion
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:49 pm
Posts: 4658
Location: on line looking at car ads
Steven Carter wrote:

Interestingly, after a typical workday I want/need quiet. And maybe some music. I find myself becoming more and more introverted as I get older, so "recharging" in a quiet setting is important to me, especially with the family and all that goes with it waiting after work (practices, rehearsals, school functions, games etc). Can't disagree with you on the engine sounds being enjoyable, and I hear torque is nice too! For now, the S2000 meets half of that....


I can't tell you how much I agree w/ that statement.... I could get into quite the dissertation here, but I'll just let the statement speak for itself. Damn, getting old sucks...

_________________
Rodney

'08 Bullitt mustang, CAM 7
Autox VP '09-'10, President '11-'12, interim President 2nd half of ‘14
proud recipient of the Bowie Grey service award '12
Now just a guy driving a mustang....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline
I got a SUX2000!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 12:07 am
Posts: 2443
Location: In the garage, under a big old Mercedes
Steven Carter wrote:
Karl Shultz wrote:
Here's something kind of off the wall: how about a diesel Mercedes? You can take advantage of the fact that resale value is not a strong point of late model MBs.

http://wilmington.craigslist.org/ctd/3977983072.html


Thanks for pointing that out, Karl! I was under the impression that everything post-W124 was unreliable and uber-expensive to repair out-of-warranty, so I had not included them on the list. Do you think that era of C or E-class is reliable? What are the weaknesses/failure points of that version of E-Class? Certainly ergonomics and NVH engineering are probably its strong suit.


I'll be honest - I'm not certain. My sense is that they're not really any different than something like a late model BMW. Also, I don't think a Mercedes is going to be any more expensive to have serviced than, say, a hybrid Lexus. But it'll probably be more expensive to fix than a Mazda3. Which I would expect - MSRP was probably double.

Check out the mercedessource channel on YouTube. That guy, Kent Bergsma, runs a business selling repair parts and documentation. Is mostly for older stuff, but he just released a big video series about buying a 10 to 15 year old MB. Probably worth a look, if you would consider one that old.

When you described something quiet, comfortable, and fuel efficient, I thought of either a VW TDI of some sort, or a diesel Merc. For your stated budget I bet you could find a really nice CPO diesel E-Class or ML. To me, if your looking for quiet and comfy, the Prius, Mazda3, or Altima are all probably the wrong droid.

_________________
Karl S.
2014 Baby, 2014 House, 2013 Ford Focus ST, 2013 BMW 328i, 1994 Mercedes E320
(Insert passive aggressive signature line here)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 2524
Location: greenville
MikeWhitney wrote:
I get why fuel economy is important to the earth, and to politicians, and for our future. What I don't get is why people let it weigh so heavily on their micro level requirements. Emotional needs I guess.

Case in point: At 10,000 miles per year, the difference in fuel cost between 30 and 35 MPG is $178 a year or $14 a month. Peanuts compared to the car payment, insurance, or depreciation. I'm with Dick, buy what you want and look at everything from a TCO perspective.

(PS - Unless you think gas will hit $10/gallon, then everything changes)


That makes an interesting political discussion. I think it is the culture that indoctrinates us into thinking so. Personally, I do what makes dollar and sense (pun intended) to me. If everybody did that then I believe technology and the free market system would take care of the problem. That is the short version, give me a dark beer and I will go on forever on how to solve all the worlds problems.

_________________
2002 MCS, 2003 MCS Track Rat, 2003 Generic White Yukon, 2003 BMWk1200rs, 1973 CB350F, 02 996. 08 Cayenne Turbo
http://www.clinehallagency.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
Karl Shultz wrote:
When you described something quiet, comfortable, and fuel efficient, I thought of either a VW TDI of some sort, or a diesel Merc. For your stated budget I bet you could find a really nice CPO diesel E-Class or ML. To me, if your looking for quiet and comfy, the Prius, Mazda3, or Altima are all probably the wrong droid.


Yeah, a Mazda3 is a sports car! :)

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:40 am 
Offline
My stiffness is only an illusion
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:49 pm
Posts: 4658
Location: on line looking at car ads
BriceJohnson wrote:
Karl Shultz wrote:
When you described something quiet, comfortable, and fuel efficient, I thought of either a VW TDI of some sort, or a diesel Merc. For your stated budget I bet you could find a really nice CPO diesel E-Class or ML. To me, if your looking for quiet and comfy, the Prius, Mazda3, or Altima are all probably the wrong droid.


Yeah, a Mazda3 is a sports car! :)


I'll second that.

_________________
Rodney

'08 Bullitt mustang, CAM 7
Autox VP '09-'10, President '11-'12, interim President 2nd half of ‘14
proud recipient of the Bowie Grey service award '12
Now just a guy driving a mustang....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:19 am 
Offline
Tire Nerd
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:40 pm
Posts: 1818
Location: Greenville, SC
MikeWhitney wrote:
I get why fuel economy is important to the earth, and to politicians, and for our future. What I don't get is why people let it weigh so heavily on their micro level requirements. Emotional needs I guess.

Case in point: At 10,000 miles per year, the difference in fuel cost between 30 and 35 MPG is $178 a year or $14 a month. Peanuts compared to the car payment, insurance, or depreciation. I'm with Dick, buy what you want and look at everything from a TCO perspective.

(PS - Unless you think gas will hit $10/gallon, then everything changes)


I think the main issue is simply ignorance. Using mpg makes it easy for people to make invalid assumptions about the utility of an added mpg. A large majority believe that 20 vs 25mpg is "the same" as 30 vs 35mpg.

It would be more helpful to get around that common error by looking at the inverse, using gallons/mile or gallons/100 miles perhaps. Then people would have to do real math to understand what's up. ;) You know, like they do in most all SI units countries.

_________________
Current stable:
2019 BMW M2 Competition slicktop 6MT
2011 BMW M3 sedan slicktop 6MT
2007 BMW 328i wagon (slushbox for now)
1975 CanAm 125MX2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:02 am 
Offline
Republican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 4356
Location: MWI/MUI Kubota FTW
I have driven the new 328i with the four cylinder engine over a two day period and was quite impressed. I hammered it for probably 80% of the time I was in it and ended up getting 29 mpg. Normal driving should yield 35 mpg. Power was on par with the 3.0 6 cylinder and I felt like the steering response was actually a little better.

CPOs should start popping up in about a year or so.

_________________
BenchWarmer Motorsports

another one of those damn LeMons heads

just another Chump :)

we are an Autocross Club Dammit............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 2524
Location: greenville
Chuck Branscomb wrote:
MikeWhitney wrote:
I get why fuel economy is important to the earth, and to politicians, and for our future. What I don't get is why people let it weigh so heavily on their micro level requirements. Emotional needs I guess.

Case in point: At 10,000 miles per year, the difference in fuel cost between 30 and 35 MPG is $178 a year or $14 a month. Peanuts compared to the car payment, insurance, or depreciation. I'm with Dick, buy what you want and look at everything from a TCO perspective.

(PS - Unless you think gas will hit $10/gallon, then everything changes)


I think the main issue is simply ignorance. Using mpg makes it easy for people to make invalid assumptions about the utility of an added mpg. A large majority believe that 20 vs 25mpg is "the same" as 30 vs 35mpg.

It would be more helpful to get around that common error by looking at the inverse, using gallons/mile or gallons/100 miles perhaps. Then people would have to do real math to understand what's up. ;) You know, like they do in most all SI units countries.


I have a client that trades cars about every 6 months and constantly tells me how good the gas milage is based on how far he went on a 1/4 of a tank!

_________________
2002 MCS, 2003 MCS Track Rat, 2003 Generic White Yukon, 2003 BMWk1200rs, 1973 CB350F, 02 996. 08 Cayenne Turbo
http://www.clinehallagency.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:39 pm
Posts: 682
Location: Raleigh
RodneyWright wrote:
Steven Carter wrote:

Interestingly, after a typical workday I want/need quiet. And maybe some music. I find myself becoming more and more introverted as I get older, so "recharging" in a quiet setting is important to me, especially with the family and all that goes with it waiting after work (practices, rehearsals, school functions, games etc). Can't disagree with you on the engine sounds being enjoyable, and I hear torque is nice too! For now, the S2000 meets half of that....


I can't tell you how much I agree w/ that statement.... I could get into quite the dissertation here, but I'll just let the statement speak for itself. Damn, getting old sucks...


Well, I am the opposite of that, maybe it’s my French Canadian roots or I’m not old enough yet, but at 54 I should be there.
In my daily drive I need something fun to drive and with character and the Abarth is just that.

From the car listed in the OP the Audi A3 diesel is not bad. I had one in 2 occasion when going to Germany and it’s a fun car.
Lots of torque but short power band. It can do 220km on the Autobahn and 9:37 BTG time on the Ring.

_________________
Patrice
1973 911 former track and AX car.
2016 VW GTI
2002 Nissan Sentra (Olivier car)
2012 Nissan Juke (Kathy car)
2010 Suzuki Kizashi (Audrey car)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
BriceJohnson wrote:
Les Davis recommends a V8. SHOCKING!

I hear a used Saturn Astra is a great car daily driver. . .


Shocking?! Perhaps? But honestly I haven't daily driven a V8 much at all in the past 7 years. My '96 Miata was my primary daily driver from '06 - '12 put almost 100K on it in that time and my '08 MX5 the past year or so and I've already put 16K on it, but that includes two trips to Key West. Lately I've been daily driving a 600cc 4 cylinder, turns 12,000 rpm, runs the 1/4 mile in 12.4 seconds and get 45 mpg, you could call me an environmentalist. :D

Daily driving that Astra was great at the fuel pump with 32 mpg, what price can one put on ones soul though...

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:14 pm 
Offline
Flipper
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 10:24 pm
Posts: 2433
Location: purveyor of the ridiculous
golf tdi twin cam. 40 mpg , 250 ft lbs torque, 150 hp.

_________________
hey yall,watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: the anti-sportscar thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:17 pm 
Offline
I got a SUX2000!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 12:07 am
Posts: 2443
Location: In the garage, under a big old Mercedes
steve remchak wrote:
I have driven the new 328i with the four cylinder engine over a two day period and was quite impressed. I hammered it for probably 80% of the time I was in it and ended up getting 29 mpg. Normal driving should yield 35 mpg. Power was on par with the 3.0 6 cylinder and I felt like the steering response was actually a little better.

CPOs should start popping up in about a year or so.


So the new version of the 328i is a 4-cylinder? That explains a whole lot. We had one as a loaner last weekend. The exhaust note seemed all wrong, and the power delivery seemed all wrong, compared to our I6 328i from the generation prior. And the steering wheel felt like it wasn't hooked up to anything. I disliked the car so much that I never bothered to open the hood to see what was under there. :lol:

_________________
Karl S.
2014 Baby, 2014 House, 2013 Ford Focus ST, 2013 BMW 328i, 1994 Mercedes E320
(Insert passive aggressive signature line here)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group