Zach Hill wrote:
The problem with speed humps/bumps is the speed at which they can be crossed varies greatly by car. In my S2k on 800# springs and 3" ground clearance, I have to slow to a crawl and go across them at an angle. People in big SUVs can and do cross them at 30+MPH and barely feel them.
I agree and disagree with this, I happen to own a big ass SUV and a sports car with 1150# springs and a couple in between. The Miata on stock suspension actually navigates the speed humps the easiest at speed, the Navigator takes a little more care, I think it is a mass thing, the Navigator having so much of it is quite jarring when driven over speed humps and I have to slow down more than the Miata. I have willingly modified the vette to make it more of a race car than a street car and don't expect to be catered to because that was my choice. The one that bothers me is the Cobra on stock suspension, if you install a speed bump that I cannot navigate in a stock suspended Mustang, a remarkably common car, without scrapping my subframe, even when going 1 mph and taking it at an angle, you have gone too far.
Let me clarify though, in Les Davis' perfect world, there would be no speed bumps or humps. I don't believe they effectively accomplish what they are intended to accomplish for the most part and the response, like most every other failed attempt at controlling human behavior, is to go more and more extremes. These extremes rarely achieve the positive results intended and just create big inconveniences at best for most and sometimes huge injustices for others.