JamesShort wrote:
Your story sure fires me up. But I have a feeling that given your effort to prove what a gem this car is, the bimbo's insurance company assumed that you would get it fixed and keep the car. With that said, if you kept it for another 5-7 years and THEN sold it, the diminished value at time of sale would be much less than if you were to sell it right after the accident, because the base value of the car is much less. So instead of giving you say $3000 in DV, they gave you $1500 in DV.
Anyway, it's not the right thing to do, I'll admit, but might have been what they were thinking. Was the damage purely body work? Or was the frame/suspension tweaked?
James, it was just the door and lower side molding. No suspension or any other issues. And I agree, that might be what they were thinking or basing their decision on, but the point was, that isn't an assumption they should be making. What if I had planned to put the car up for sale the following week? Or in 6 months? Or, even worse, just after Carfax gets the report that the car sustained "significant damage" and therefore REALLY lowers both the car's perceived market value and also the potential buyer pool?
The insurance industry isn't set up for people who are passionate about cars. It's for Joe Blow driving a '92 Civic with 350K miles who just needs a new reproduction bumper so he doesn't get pulled over.