⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:12 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:22 am
Posts: 1500
Location: Having Jeb mount my rubberbands
DickRasmussen wrote:
2011 Mustang V6: 3453 (prelim Ford Specs)


Wow, my 08 GT weighs 3380. I guess they should drop a v8 in it to shed some pounds from that fatty.

_________________
2001 Honda S2000 - SOLD
2012 Boss 302
2003 BMW 330i


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:31 pm
Posts: 1173
as always, peter egan has covered this topic

http://www.roadandtrack.com/column/a-pound-of-feathers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:42 pm 
Offline
Stalker's boyfriend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:35 pm
Posts: 2858
Location: Looking for Chuck on the Intraweb
Jason Tower wrote:
as always, peter egan has covered this topic

http://www.roadandtrack.com/column/a-pound-of-feathers


That's a great article. Thanks for posting! :) - AB

_________________
'14 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 4WD
Super Westerfield Bros - '93 Integra - LeChump Du Jour
STX 93 - Scion FR-S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:32 pm
Posts: 490
Location: Mooresville, NC
Donnie,

Yep, I owned a '76 Mustang II Ghia back in the late 80's. With a little 171ci V6 and barely any weight, it was somewhat quick for what it was. Of course, that is quick up to 90mph and nothing after, LOL. (and I said "quick", I didn't say "fast")


Dick,

I'd love to see Mustangs go back to the Fox body formula. Of course, all that extra chassis rigidity of the SN197 comes at a cost of weight and that is why the Fox and SN95 chassis' were like wet noodles without full length subframe connectors.

_________________
2003 Torch Red Corvette Z06 ST3/TT3 #01

Road Courses: Rock - VIR-F - VIR-N - VIR-S - VIR-P - VIR-G - RRR - CMP - Road Atlanta - CMS - NSS - NCCAR - Mid-Ohio - Watkins Glen
Drag Strips: Red River - Byron - Cordova - Route 66 - Raceway Park - zMAX


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:09 am 
Offline
Honda >> Ford
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 1:54 am
Posts: 2052
Donnie Barnes wrote:
So what you guys want....wait for it....wait for it.......WAIT FOR IT.....

(I don't wanna wait again)

Is a MUSTANG 2!!!!!


When the Fox body Mustangs debuted, the magazines said that it was actually lighter than the Mustang II. They may have been comparing a notchback '79 with a hatchback '78. In any event, the Mustang II was pretty porky for its size and era.

Expensive too. I recall standing in the showroom of Alexander Ford, wracking my 14-year old brain for a reason to like the abomination before me (a 1974 Mustang II notchback), and hearing my mother comment that it cost over $1000 per cylinder. $4000 would have bought you a 1973 Mach I.

_________________
Art McDonald
Premier Amateur #518
2008 Dishman Cup
Pivot Cone Snob

Rodney is a waxer (but in a good way)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group