clinehall wrote:
On a related subject. I got a call the other day that the family of the instructor that was killed at Summit Point as filed suit against the Driver, the track, NASA, and State Farm. Apparently the instructors their are considered an employee of the track and they are suing State Farm (which was the deceased insurance company) as they are stating they were never offered Un or Underinsured Motorist coverage.
I'm not a lawyer, but it seems that if taken to jury, the track should be exposed to gross negligence by simply allowing a path to an unprotected tree to be traversed by a car...or at least a really good legal team could likely eat that exposure alive. Note there are numerous tracks that still have unprotected tree exposure available (Roebling perhaps has many). In 1980 that might have been considered "normal" but in 2015?
As to the un/underinsured coverage...would it have even mattered (much) since the event occurred on a race track, and the policy would have excluded coverage above a very low max amount anyway?