Kevin Harvey wrote:
Since this thread has derailed already, I will add my two cents.
First Penny: I agree with the statements on the current crop of youth texting and how it has affected their spelling and written English skills. I constantly battle it with my oldest daughter.
Second Penny: However, as forms of communication evolve, words and vocal and written expressions change. Take ANY one of the posts in this thread and think about how they would have been communicated 400 years ago, 200 hundred years ago, heck even 50 years ago. We are in the middle of a shift in communication. This one is just more pronounced due to the available electronic technology. 200 years from now, what our children are texting today may look like longhand.
Ok, more than two cents worth, but I feel better being the devil's advocate.
-Kevin
you almost had me Kevin. but the English language is being butchered. a language that is arguably at least 1000 years old.
not in any form whatsoever is texting evolving the English language.
new words are a sign of an evolution of a language. the use of "r" & "u" as shortcuts for existing words is about as much English as Ebonics is a language. at least Ebonics can claim words added to the lexicon.
texting is the stupidest crap ever perpetrated on the general public. what is the point of typing on a device that allows two people to actually hear each others' voice and carry on a back and forth conversation in the process. holy shit, Alexander Graham Bell must be spinning like a steam turbine in his grave.
and don't get me started on the need to watch a movie on a telephone. OMFG...............

_________________
BenchWarmer Motorsports
another one of those damn LeMons heads
just another Chump
we are an Autocross Club Dammit............