Chuck Frank wrote:
Not saying anything to demean Johnathan, he drove some amazing runs given the conditions, but because of the constantly changing weather conditions and equipment problems any/all results were far from meaningful IMHO.
How so? Everyone got eight timed runs, correct? There were few second drivers (if any?) for changing conditions to have affected much. Jonathan only won by a little more (if any) than he won by in the same car two years ago when it was dry. Last year doesn't count as he stood on his first four runs when everyone else got 12 (and he still won). Just how often does someone put down times at ANY ProSolo, let alone the Finale, that would win in just their first four runs, anyway?
So while you're not "saying anything to demean" and then blowing off "any/all" results, the two don't mix. Unless there's something else I'm missing. Please enlighten as I'm genuinely curious.
Quote:
A rear wheel drive car was like bringing a rock to a gun fight.
Has been in AS for the last three years now at the Pro. I don't think Hoosier made it any big secret about the new rain compound, either. You must have gotten REALLY old tires, too, since that new compound came out sometime in 2007, IIRC. The tires Jonathan was on are the newer compound and were bought prior to Nats last year, IIRC. Either that or there's an even newer compound I don't know about and Jonathan was on the "old" compound as well.
--Donnie