scottjohnson wrote:
This one ought to be mandatory reading:
Roger Johnson's course design handbookWarning, direct link to a PDF file.
Anyhow, I wouldn't consider his writing to be gospel, but it's a pretty darn good basis for course design.Roger Johnson's Course Design Handbook wrote:
Track the number of DNFs for other than mechanical failure
• The goal is zero:
• acceptable is 1 in 20 on the first run, 1 in 100 there after
• Number and frequency of pylons hit
• The goal is zero
• Acceptable is 1 car in 10 hitting any; no more than 3
for any one car
• Keep in mind, the main goal of course design is to provide the Solo
II competitors with Fair, Fun and Safe Competition.
How did we do?
The discussion of "input density" is also interesting.
I wasn't there, so I'll leave the remainder of the discussion to everyone who was.
Scott
Most every AXer that has run one of Roger's courses does. Roger designs one of the two national championship courses almost every year, and his designs are the best I have ever run.
Courses should never be "painful" for the competitor or the course workers. When an STS Civic sets FTD on a long course there were way too many tight gates IMHO. This is spoken in generalities tho, since I was not there I cannot speak to this particular course.