Chuck Frank wrote:
Richard, wasn't implying you were the one(s) trying to beat the rain
Sorry about that, no I don't think you were and you didn't name names.

I have been in a crappy mood the past few days and my post above reflected that. I posted in in the morning before work and in the drive in to work wished I had worded it differently. But I also decided to not edit it as I hate it when people edit their posts to hide stupid stuff they say. So, I can now say...
At the very end of the drivers meeting is when they said for two driver cars to run all in A. (I think the idea was to do all in A in one heat and then all in B the next to balance things out). I have no doubt that only a few people heard this and many (including you) didn't. I think it was just an on-the-fly attempt to make things run better on Sunday that didn't work as planned.
Also, I didn't want anyone to read my post much earlier about being late to work and think I was whining or complaining about having my name called on the PA. I had no problem with being called over the PA to work. I was a bit unhappy at the time with the wording (attempt at humour that I didn't find funny at all) that was used, but **** happens. Anyhow I think a PA announcement is appropriate regardless of why someone is late (good reason or not). My post above was me just trying to provide an example of how the A/B two driver system doesn't work even when you try to do the right thing. I am also not saying we should switch how we do it either.
_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.comMoney can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.