Ok, so to get back on topic and discuss the GK area some more.
If you haven't voted please do so.
If you haven't read Miles post on course design in that area let me summarize it down to my take on it. It has to run in the direction we ran the T&T. The 1st half of the course is very limited due too bad concrete and not touching the GK station. So the flexability really only starts out at the main runway. By that point your pretty low on cones unless you use the minimalist approach in the 1st half or start a little further in. Which is doable.
The areas that need concrete work at the site. Miles, Pres, and VPs correct me if I am wrong on this. There is far less work to be done to do needed patching around the main loop. And it needs to be done regardless of the GK area. There are some serious sections (not holes) that need work in the GK area to open it up and improve safety.
The Golden Knights have the option to take our dates at anytime, right up to the day before. It is their area. So event chairs would need to design 2 courses. Plan A for the GK area and Plan B for the loop. Miles and I went through this very situation last October. Still doable, but more work.
Weeks before an event Miles and I found that it was best to go down and weed whack and sweep. We would have to do both areas just incase we got bumped out of the GK area. This is not a job for a couple of people. A crew of about 10 people are really needed so it isn't hell for a couple of people. Maybe renting a sweeper would help a lot for site prep here.
Scott had mentioned that during the next "patching day" that we also spread weed killer in the cracks of the areas we want to use. I think that might go a long way to reducing pre-event cleanup and improving the site for our needs. The site owners sure won't complain about reduced weeds and improved concrete
Rob and I are open to either area for June. But members need to be willing to put some skin into the game if we are to explore this area more and maintain the existing loop.
Graham