Rob Keehner wrote:
Quote:
The UTQC system is certainly not arbitrary, it is an actual test, that has actual specified methods to perform. A manufacturer can specify a Lower number if it so wishes (obviously for marketing purposes) but it does indeed meet the lower number.
Or the other way when SCCA changes a number and Toyo sands a 140 off a mold and stamps a 200 back in.

That is exactly what they did. Same tire, same construction, different rating. A driver used R1Rs with a 140 stamped on the side at Dixie this year, was protested and subsequently DSQ'ed.
Quoth the Rack of Tires:
"
NOTE:
At the end of 2014, Toyo changed the Uniform Tire Quality Grade (UTQG) of their Proxes R1R Extreme Performance Summer tire to reflect a 200 Treadwear rating.
UTQG ratings for Treadwear, Traction and Temperature are based on tests conducted by tire manufacturers and reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). These regulations allow tire manufacturers to under-rate their tires’ capabilities, but prohibit over-rating them. UTQG ratings are required to be printed on their labels and branded on tire sidewalls.
Toyo assigned the 140 Treadwear rating to match the UTQG Treadwear rating required by competition rules when the Proxes R1R was introduced, however subsequent Toyo wear data revealed the tire line earned a 200 Treadwear rating.
With some competition rules now requiring higher UTQG Treadwear ratings, Toyo decided it was time to officially change the Proxes R1R line’s rating to accurately reflect its capabilities.
*In order to help drivers confirm which tire they will receive, we have identified the tires by listing their Treadwear rating on the product Specs tab."
_________________
Steve Carter
1972 Datsun 240Z-- resto pics at
http://picasaweb.google.com/srcartermd2007 GPW Honda S2000-- STR 86