⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:08 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 11:33 am 
Offline
Tadpole Lover

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:42 pm
Posts: 3479
Well, regardless of whether my RS stays in STS & they allow wider tires for heavier cars, or it goes to STX where the wider tires are already allowed, my RS is stuck with at most 225's - unless they want to allow the 22B fender flares?

:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 12:29 pm 
Offline
I hate working the course at autox and I must tell you about it, often.

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:53 am
Posts: 1718
Richard Casto wrote:
Other interesting items (some are up for member comment)...
* Effective 1/1/2005, move all AWD vehicles to STX. I guess this means no more Subaru RS in STS?


Hmmm.... ALL AWD cars? Wouldn't that mean the STi lands in STX too? All the Scoobies thrown int together as 1 big happy family :lol: Where do I send in my vote :wink:

Graham

_________________
http://www.greywinds.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 12:32 pm 
Offline
Tadpole Lover

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:42 pm
Posts: 3479
STi is specifically disallowed in STX, even though its displacement already makes it ineligible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 5:19 am 
Offline
I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:08 pm
Posts: 1524
Location: Raleigh NC
Just because a proposal goes out for member comment doesn't mean it's already decided. The comments that will make the most difference will be those that are backed with solid data. The letters that just say I agree (or disagree) with the proposal will get little attention especially if they come from those with special interests. The SEB specifically said that the proposed reclassing of the Celica GTS to GS did not happen because the only in-favor comments they received were from GTS owners.

_________________
SPIN or WIN!
there's no glory for going slow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 8:58 am 
Offline
Stalker's boyfriend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:35 pm
Posts: 2858
Location: Looking for Chuck on the Intraweb
Chuck Frank wrote:
Just because a proposal goes out for member comment doesn't mean it's already decided. The comments that will make the most difference will be those that are backed with solid data. The letters that just say I agree (or disagree) with the proposal will get little attention especially if they come from those with special interests. The SEB specifically said that the proposed reclassing of the Celica GTS to GS did not happen because the only in-favor comments they received were from GTS owners.


The funny thing about GT-S not moving was that the RSX-S is about is nearly identical when you take into account the larger displacement and more weight. I know GH actually felt the GT-S was a fine fit in GS. Not that it mattered much to me, for after the Peru Tour last year, I decided that STS was where I was going, regardless of the move.

In this case, you will have all of the 2.5 RS saying no way, and the rest of the STS drivers probably could care less. - AB

_________________
'14 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 4WD
Super Westerfield Bros - '93 Integra - LeChump Du Jour
STX 93 - Scion FR-S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 9:49 am 
Offline
Mr. Nice Guy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 10:16 am
Posts: 387
Aaron Buckley wrote:
In this case, you will have all of the 2.5 RS saying no way, and the rest of the STS drivers probably could care less. - AB


The one thing here is that other STS drivers have said its a good fit for the class. To quote heyward wagner from memory

"As an STS competitor I would love not to have to line up against a 2.5RS ever again. As a STAC memeber, I feel that the car solidly belongs in STS"

-Tom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 10:24 am 
Offline
Tadpole Lover

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:42 pm
Posts: 3479
Yeah, I saw that - good for Heyward! :thumbsup:

On the other hand, Phil O. appears to be a bit of a dick. "I really don't understand why all the backlash over this housekeeping item."

Ummm... because the Civics are kicking the AWD cars' butt in STS, and STX already has an AWD car with > 100 more hp and wider tires? No, that can't be it, must try to think of another reason...

:roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 10:32 am 
Offline
Tadpole Lover

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:42 pm
Posts: 3479
So if the rule passes, which car should I drop the WRX engine into? I'm thinking I should put it in the blue RS (since it's been with us longer) and just take it to VIR a whole bunch... maybe do an autox in SM once in a while?

And I could sell the silver RS, buy an MR2 Spyder & play around in CS. And then we'd have a convertible car that we could take for weekends in the mountains. Ooooh... it's not sounding quite so bad now! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group