Ryan Holton wrote:
Chuck Branscomb wrote:
Comparing costs of A6s vs something like a Star Spec et al is really not a significant argument.
Some would disagree with you. The folks at the pointy end aren't going to start with a full tread set of tires. Factor in the additional costs of shaving + the reduced life of the tire and the costs get even closer.
Of course the win-at-any-cost group will figure out which tires are the "best" for a given pavement at a given location, and they will then figure out what level of tread depth equals the best performance, and then they will have multiple sets of tires shaved to the correct depths and perhaps different brands for different pavement types, etc.
For the high-end national level competitors, cost will likely be only marginally smaller. However, what I was referring to is the other 95+% of people who just want to have some fun and be reasonably competitive at local events. In stock class today, that's not possible without autocross-style R-comps, but with street tire stock class, you can actually show up and drive what you came in on.
Example: A couple of weeks ago, I met Jackie down in Savannah, and we did an autocross on Hutchinson Island with the local SCCA there (using the pit/paddock for the race track there which is a public road, bizarre and wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it and driven on it!). Driving the E46 in STX (only thing that puts it in STX is a rear bar and 1/2" wider front wheel (square setup)), I placed 2nd out of about 15 drivers on Pilot Super Sports (which are fantastic tires by the way) the car was driven there on. Had a great time, competitive, no changing tires, etc. I'm guessing many newcomers to the sport would also appreciate the opportunity to not have to pony up for R-comps/wheels/changing at events/etc.
So if the sport is ONLY about the top 2% of drivers, then yeah, perhaps costs won't be much different. I'm thinking the other 98% might want a say however.