Karl Shultz wrote:
Donnie, just out of curiosity, why do you think that is? Is it the ten year head start on development?
It seems to me that the C5 would definitely be the easy choice, as you mentioned. Surely a lot of the setup stuff the SS guys have figured out would carry over...or is there more different to a Z06 than I think? I don't know Corvettes at all.
I also wonder about an RX-7 TT. Trouble is finding one that's still stock.
Forget the RX-7. Even if you find one stock you won't be able to keep it running for two days of autocrossing, much less anything else.
Yeah, basically, I'm not sure the C5 can do it, but if anything can, that's probably it. That 40th 911 is interesting, too. But basically think about it like this...the S2000 has 10 years of development by some of the top names in the business through DEEP fields. That's on a well designed, relatively light, and fairly small double wishbone car that can fit a lot of tire for its weight. Oh, and a well balanced car, too. The Vette is heavy and big. The 911 isn't well balanced, anyway. Nobody has ever really developed a 911 for stock autocross, either. And how many people care to go buy a non-Z06 C5 to "play" with? Why would you? Z06's are so cheap as it is...
So I'm not necessarily saying those cars can't beat an S2000. I'm just saying nobody is likely to develop them far enough to...or at least nobody with the driving talent to also get it done. The depth of competition just won't ever happen without some more interesting cars to car people.
--Donnie