⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:10 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Pedantic points question
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:30 pm
Posts: 303
My brain works in strange ways. I just came up with this...

Based on:
Quote:
7.3. Points are only awarded to a participant that completes at least one run. DNFs do not count as completed runs.
and
Quote:
For Tarheel Sports Car Club year-end trophies, a competitor must enter and run at least one more than half the number of club events.


Is that "start to run" at least one more than half, or "complete a run in" at least more than half?

What is the status of an event DNF (i.e. DNF'd every run) in terms of eligibility for year-end trophies? Obviously from the first quote it is no points, but is it an "enter and run" or not?

This becomes relevant at the end of the season under this scenario: If 5 events are required to be eligible for trophies, and a competitor has scored points in 4 events and DNFd the 5th, are they eligible?

(It's pretty clear that DNS and DNW count as if you'd never showed up in the first place. This only applies to DNF.)

_________________
Martyn Wheeler
AXing Kit's '05 Mazda 3, #29 HStock
(when The Gonzo Symphonic allows)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:05 pm
Posts: 2474
Location: 21st century digital boy...
5 DNF's in one day? I'm sure it's happened, but wow. Anyone guilty of this? :lol:

My $.02 is that it should count if it wasn't a reckless display of cone carnage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:03 pm 
Offline
Queen of the Guinea Hens
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 11:32 pm
Posts: 3122
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
IMHO, and that's all it is, "run" is both a verb and a noun. In 7.3 it is being used as a noun. In your subsequent quote, it is a verb. I know it sounds like I'm being uber-pedantic, but I think it's relevant. 7.3 is talking about individual "runs" and how they are scored. That other quote is really talking about "competing" when it says "run", and IMHO, a competitor that shows up, takes runs, and happens to not get a score on those runs has still *competed* in the event, even if they lost horribly due to errors.

One could probably argue that entering and showing up but having all DNS's shouldn't count, but IMHO if you pay your money AND you actually show up, you should get credit for it toward points. Especially since you didn't actually GET points. I mean you definitely *tried* to get points, and that's what the quote about year end trophies is trying to enforce. You gotta attempt more than half.

(And I can totally see the DNS thing both ways, but the DNF one seems pretty clear to *me* that you should get credit for the event.)


--Donnie

_________________
My Blog


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:22 pm 
Offline
I have a stimulating package
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:59 pm
Posts: 1542
Location: NW Raleigh
Donnie Barnes wrote:
IMHO, and that's all it is, "run" is both a verb and a noun. In 7.3 it is being used as a noun. In your subsequent quote, it is a verb. I know it sounds like I'm being uber-pedantic, but I think it's relevant. 7.3 is talking about individual "runs" and how they are scored. That other quote is really talking about "competing" when it says "run", and IMHO, a competitor that shows up, takes runs, and happens to not get a score on those runs has still *competed* in the event, even if they lost horribly due to errors.

One could probably argue that entering and showing up but having all DNS's shouldn't count, but IMHO if you pay your money AND you actually show up, you should get credit for it toward points. Especially since you didn't actually GET points. I mean you definitely *tried* to get points, and that's what the quote about year end trophies is trying to enforce. You gotta attempt more than half.

(And I can totally see the DNS thing both ways, but the DNF one seems pretty clear to *me* that you should get credit for the event.)


--Donnie


What he said.

In short, if you pay your dues, pay your entry fees, and at least try, you WILL get a trophy at the end of the year**. You don't even have to be good. :)

**unless you run novice class, since we kick folks out of it when they get good

_________________
Dustin Fredrickson
-- I'm a nobody --


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:52 pm 
Offline
Honda >> Ford
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 1:54 am
Posts: 2052
Dustin Fredrickson wrote:
Donnie Barnes wrote:
IMHO, and that's all it is, "run" is both a verb and a noun. In 7.3 it is being used as a noun. In your subsequent quote, it is a verb. I know it sounds like I'm being uber-pedantic, but I think it's relevant. 7.3 is talking about individual "runs" and how they are scored. That other quote is really talking about "competing" when it says "run", and IMHO, a competitor that shows up, takes runs, and happens to not get a score on those runs has still *competed* in the event, even if they lost horribly due to errors.

One could probably argue that entering and showing up but having all DNS's shouldn't count, but IMHO if you pay your money AND you actually show up, you should get credit for it toward points. Especially since you didn't actually GET points. I mean you definitely *tried* to get points, and that's what the quote about year end trophies is trying to enforce. You gotta attempt more than half.

(And I can totally see the DNS thing both ways, but the DNF one seems pretty clear to *me* that you should get credit for the event.)


--Donnie


What he said.

In short, if you pay your dues, pay your entry fees, and at least try, you WILL get a trophy at the end of the year**. You don't even have to be good. :)

**unless you run novice class, since we kick folks out of it when they get good


I hope we're not considering changing rule 7.3. Would we actually award minimal points (1?) for mere attendance? What is there are 8 people in the class that day, and one DNF/DNS's all runs. Would he/she get the same number of points as the person who finished 7th, but actually had timed runs? That could make a difference at the end of the year.

I can see no excuse for all DNFs. Let's say you DNF your first two runs, and you don't know why. (Happened to me once) GET SOME HELP. Get another driver to ride with you on your next run with instructions to help you find your mistake. (That's what I did, and she told me right after I blew by the mystery gate for my 3rd DNF ... but at least I knew in time for run 4)


Old war story about DNFs:
I chaired my first NCAC event at NC Motor Speedway (We ran parts of the infield course and parts of the oval. Only one car was destroyed - a heavily modified Vega that deserved to hit that fence pole.) Anyway, in the last heat a very agitated lady appeared at the T&S table and complained that the awful courseworkers had DNF'ed her husband on all of his runs. She went on to say that they had left their home in WVa at midnight to make it to the event, and it just wasn't fair to DNF someone who made such an effort to attend the event. Blah Blah Blah

Luckily, then-President Kurt Spitzner was at the table with me. He smiled and nodded, then repeated "this is an amateur event with unpaid courseworkers, and I'm sorry about your husband's situation, but there's nothing I can do about it" four or five times. She finally stormed off. Kurt observed: "It's not so important that they all go away happy, just that they go away". Harsh, but having a metallic-prune Gremlin as your daily driver/autox/track car gives you a certain perspective about others' little problems.

_________________
Art McDonald
Premier Amateur #518
2008 Dishman Cup
Pivot Cone Snob

Rodney is a waxer (but in a good way)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:30 am 
Offline
I have a stimulating package
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:59 pm
Posts: 1542
Location: NW Raleigh
Arthur McDonald wrote:

I hope we're not considering changing rule 7.3. Would we actually award minimal points (1?) for mere attendance?


No, I was actually commenting more on the other rule pertaining to "eligibility for a trophy". 7.3 relates to how many points you get to count towards that trophy, which is a different argument. Besides, changing rules requires work, and stuff.

_________________
Dustin Fredrickson
-- I'm a nobody --


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:30 pm
Posts: 1205
Location: Wilmington, NC
Arthur McDonald wrote:

I hope we're not considering changing rule 7.3. Would we actually award minimal points (1?) for mere attendance? What is there are 8 people in the class that day, and one DNF/DNS's all runs. Would he/she get the same number of points as the person who finished 7th, but actually had timed runs? That could make a difference at the end of the year.

I can see no excuse for all DNFs. Let's say you DNF your first two runs, and you don't know why. (Happened to me once) GET SOME HELP. Get another driver to ride with you on your next run with instructions to help you find your mistake. (That's what I did, and she told me right after I blew by the mystery gate for my 3rd DNF ... but at least I knew in time for run 4)


I can only offer one. The first event this year at Laurinburg, my brother and I were competing as any good sibling rivalry should. On his last run he got me by a few tenths of a second. Fully expecting him to win we were shocked at the awards tent when my name was called as first place. They never said anything about DNF's at the end of his run, but T&S had him down for 4 DNF's. We were completely clueless he needed any help.

We decided from then on out half of our runs we will ride with each other to help each other so that wouldn't happen again.

_________________
2005 Mazda RX8 STX 11

NCR Solo Chair & Cape Fear Chapter Coordinator
http://www.ncrscca.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:19 am 
Offline
Tire Nerd
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:40 pm
Posts: 1818
Location: Greenville, SC
Arthur McDonald wrote:
I can see no excuse for all DNFs.


Funny story -- when I came out of autox retirement running my first event in 15 years or so at the non-points event at the end of 2005, I was pulled to autox by Jackie (16 at the time) wanting to learn what this is all about. She had been to the teen driving school at the Performance Center and was anxious to try autox having heard my stories over the years and all.

Well, I never heard any announcements, and nobody said anything to us about my DNFs. We spent the whole day mainly working on her driving (and me trying to teach her how to make the stupid automatic in the 850R respond -- she switched to the E46 with proper manual from the next event onward). Finally on my 6th run through the course, just as we go blasting by a gate way off to the right in the M5, she casually mentions, "shouldn't you be going through that gate over there?" Zooooom by goes that gate off to my right for the 6th time in a row!

I was like ugh, ugh, damn!! She follows that up with "I think you've been missing it all day long". :D :D :D I knew at that point I really needed to work on student-teacher communication. :lol: I'm sure she just chalked it up as yet another learning event a child has that their parent is perhaps a partial (total?) quack at times.

So on the 7th run that day, I actually didn't DNF thus making my first timed run with THSCC since 1984 actually valid.

_________________
Current stable:
2019 BMW M2 Competition slicktop 6MT
2011 BMW M3 sedan slicktop 6MT
2007 BMW 328i wagon (slushbox for now)
1975 CanAm 125MX2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:07 pm
Posts: 744
Location: Cary, NC
Pedantic? Had to look that one up. Thanks, Martyn - I've already learned something new today. BTW, is it legal in Stock class to use tyres in place of tires? :lol:

Funny, I also did a double-take when I first read the original post - since when do we award a competitor 7.3 points for completing at least one run?

_________________
Keith Q.
2008 Top Gun
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmX8XuZ_DCo&NR=1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:27 am 
Offline
My stiffness is only an illusion
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:49 pm
Posts: 4658
Location: on line looking at car ads
Keith Quistorff wrote:
Pedantic? Had to look that one up. Thanks, Martyn - I've already learned something new today.


:oops: same here.... :oops:

_________________
Rodney

'08 Bullitt mustang, CAM 7
Autox VP '09-'10, President '11-'12, interim President 2nd half of ‘14
proud recipient of the Bowie Grey service award '12
Now just a guy driving a mustang....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:15 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Keith Quistorff wrote:
Pedantic?


I wish there was a service that showed popularity of words over time. I have noticed more and more people using "pedantic" over the past year or so. It's popularity seems to be on the rise!

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 2028
Location: Raleigh, NC
Martyn,

I would not describe that as a pedantic point. After all, the use of that word has more of a pejorative/ostentacious pheel to it (edit: and you don't come across like that)..perhaps picayune or persnickety? :lol:

{puts down his dusty thesaurus}

_________________
Steve Carter
1972 Datsun 240Z-- resto pics at http://picasaweb.google.com/srcartermd
2007 GPW Honda S2000-- STR 86


Last edited by Steven Carter on Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 3172
Location: Seattle, WA
Steven Carter wrote:
Martyn,

I would not describe that as a pedantic point. After all, the use of that word has more of a pejorative/ostentacious pheel to it..perhaps picayune or persnickety? :lol:

{puts down his dusty thesaurus}
How did I know Steve was going to reply to this thread with a perfectly smart ass reply like this :lol:

_________________
2011/2012 Autox VP
2013/2014.5 President
2013 Top Gun

2015 Fit

22R-EC => 4G63 => D16Y7 + D16Y8 => EJ255 + K24Z2 => K20Z3 + K24Z2 => K24Z2 + M54 => L15B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 2028
Location: Raleigh, NC
Just kidding, of course....

"Said the scorpion to the frog 'I cannot help myself--it's my nature.'" :oops:


http://allaboutfrogs.org/stories/scorpion.html

_________________
Steve Carter
1972 Datsun 240Z-- resto pics at http://picasaweb.google.com/srcartermd
2007 GPW Honda S2000-- STR 86


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:30 pm
Posts: 303
I expected (and hoped) the correct answer to be the one Dustin gave. It seems the fairest and most sensible to me too.

Basically, if you cross the line at the start of one run, you count as showing up. So if your car breaks the differential on your first launch and rolls gently through the start line, then you pack up and go home in disgust, it still counts as making a run. Or if you unwittingly miss the same gate every time through the course, which has happened surprisingly often with some tricky courses in the past.

It was actually the Byers at the first event that triggered this. I knew they'd both been there because I had to reclass them as FSP from DSP. I then noticed that my program had flagged John as having run one more than half (1+(2/2) = 2, at this point in the season) but not Bobby.

What I'll do is change my program to recognize DNF results and award them 0 (zero) points for that event rather than award them none at all. It's a subtle difference but could be important for eligibility.

As a side note, runs in NOV count for eligibility even though there is no YLN points, so if a NOV runs 4 events and wins the last, and runs one event in open, they're still eligible for a year end trophy in that open class. (My program already does that. It tracks NOV points, just doesn't print them out.)


While I'm rocking the boat ;) the rules on the website on NOV year long points and when to transition to open are a little inconsistent in wording and application. The rules in one place say we are still running YLN (and have said so ever since we dropped it), while at events we say "welcome to open" to everyone who gets a trophy in NOV, while at one point in the rules it says it takes two finishes in the top three to kick you up.

_________________
Martyn Wheeler
AXing Kit's '05 Mazda 3, #29 HStock
(when The Gonzo Symphonic allows)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group