Jason Mauldin wrote:
This type of comparison is pretty stupid.
Autocrossing is a sport in and of itself. It takes a certain skillset to be good at autocross, and a slightly different skillset to be good at track events. Sure there is a little bit of overlap between the two, but saying one is superior to the other, is just plain ridiculous.
If you don't "get it", or you suck at it, or you just prefer to do something else, then fine, do it. If you have creative feedback, or suggestions to make it better, that's one thing, but don't come in here and piss on someone else's hobby of choice. That's just childish.
assuming this is directed at me, i wasn't making any attempt to disparage autoxers, nor did i post the triangle graphic claiming that w2w was superior. i just offered a possible explanation on why that graphic exists in the first place, along with an (attempted) humorous analogy because frankly i just love analogies. every culture/subculture has hierarchies, either real or perceived, legitimate or stereotyped, which will always be the subject of jokes. within the w2w realm "real" racers tease lemons/chump wannabees, bmwcca folks look down their collective noses at nasa, euro drivers characterize domestic classes as neanderthals, etc. and each of these snubs exists equally in reverse. in computers we have

and each of those gets broken down. inside the linux camp it's debian vs redhat vs slackware/gentoo. and then the debian crowd breaks down into original vs ubuntu vs mint. and then ubuntu has gnome vs kde vs icewm or whatever. if you can't laugh at yourself, expect others to do it for you
