Shortly it will have to be decision time about Rockingham as a rallycross site. I will be writing a "debriefing" for the site management to make sure they are OK with how things went. I expect they will be fine with letting us continue.
The site fee is significantly higher than Four Oaks, so if we decide to keep running at Rockingham, we will need no fewer cars than we had yesterday to keep from losing money. 45+ would be best.
An event at Four Oaks can be run with about 30 without any financial problems for the club. The soil condition at Four Oaks could be considered to be marginally better than Rockingham. "Like racing on the beach," Kevin Allen said
We did have some ideas for course style which could open up the line and allow people to choose where to drive based on the surface condition (think a full-course meandering widely-paced slalom with only inside pointer cones and no outside cones. Drive wherever you want to, but be sure to be on the right side of the cones and in the right sequence!)
Maybe I should start a poll to get some feedback from our rallycross participants about going back to this venue. Frankly, if our participation numbers do not continue to rise, we may have to cross Rockingham off of our site list for a while.
_________________
Mike Whitney
whit32@gmail.com, 919-454-5445
V10, V8, V8t, I6, I6, V6, F4t, I4, I4, I4, I4, I2, 1, 1