⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:08 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 3/4 ton suburban brake question
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:09 pm 
Offline
Republican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 4356
Location: MWI/MUI Kubota FTW
why would this vehicle use more rear pad than front pad? 65K miles, solely a tow vehicle for the last 20K miles.

i pulled the wheels today as the damn thing doesn't stop very well in my opinion. i believe the trailer was doing a large portion of the brake work.

i found the fronts are at least 55% left but the rears are at 30% at best. both original.

i'm thinking traction control is chewing the rear pads. thoughts?

plus i'm fairly sure she has glazed the fronts. towing thru the mountains.

_________________
BenchWarmer Motorsports

another one of those damn LeMons heads

just another Chump :)

we are an Autocross Club Dammit............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:49 pm
Posts: 313
Location: wilmington
what year is it, does it have 4 wheel discs or are the rears drums?

_________________
#77 nasa spec 3
e36 M3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:31 pm
Posts: 1173
my excursion uses rear pads faster than fronts too


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:59 pm 
Offline
Republican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 4356
Location: MWI/MUI Kubota FTW
Sean O'Connell wrote:
what year is it, does it have 4 wheel discs or are the rears drums?


2005, 4 wheel disc.

with the new cheap front pads it will stand on its nose... briefly.

i would have changed the rear pads this evening except some shit-for-brains design engineer felt this truck needed a Torx screw head as a guide pin on the rear calipers. plus i can't get the f**********g caliper brackets loose so as to turn / change any of the rotors.

pisss me the Fu*********** off.

_________________
BenchWarmer Motorsports

another one of those damn LeMons heads

just another Chump :)

we are an Autocross Club Dammit............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:49 pm
Posts: 313
Location: wilmington
Steve you dont own torx sockts? you drive a BMW!

Cline take notes, caliper mounting bracket bolts should not back out easily. there is probably just some locktite on there.

i really dont have much experience with those trucks other than the front rotors seem to warp at nothing.

_________________
#77 nasa spec 3
e36 M3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:12 am 
Offline
I have a stimulating package
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:59 pm
Posts: 1542
Location: NW Raleigh
AFAIK, my 120k mile Silverado (2001), with 4 wheel discs, is on original front pads. I've replaced the rear pads once. My father-in-law saw the same thing with his Silverado. Wearing rear pads quicker is normal, it seems.

_________________
Dustin Fredrickson
-- I'm a nobody --


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:25 pm
Posts: 770
Location: Greenville, NC
Sean O'Connell wrote:
Steve you dont own torx sockts? you drive a BMW!

Cline take notes, caliper mounting bracket bolts should not back out easily. there is probably just some locktite on there.


That's just mean, but I'm not the one who left the track at CMP and slid 100 yards making a 540 degree spin either.

_________________
Rubbin' is Racin'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:25 pm
Posts: 770
Location: Greenville, NC
Can you guys believe my Silverado had drum brakes on the back?

_________________
Rubbin' is Racin'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:48 am 
Offline
Republican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 4356
Location: MWI/MUI Kubota FTW
WalterHouston wrote:
Can you guys believe my Silverado had drum brakes on the back?


my Silverado W/T has rear drums.

the problem with the Torx head is it is too shallow to get the bit to bite well enough to get any leverage.

next week it goes to ...................... WWDDD

_________________
BenchWarmer Motorsports

another one of those damn LeMons heads

just another Chump :)

we are an Autocross Club Dammit............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 4:46 pm 
Offline
(that's pronouced 'bah-kah)
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 1038
Location: Durham
Steve the rear brakes will wear more on a tow vehicle. The trailer shifts wieght forward and increases the tongue weight and holds the tow vehicles rear suspension loaded. This effectively lessens the amount of work on the front and increases rear work load.

_________________
2004 C5(415whp,390ft/lbs),
1997C5,1997Trans Am, 1986 C4,
1990 Miata, 1976 MGB,1997 Protege, 1989 MR2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 347
Location: Apex, NC
Bernie Baake wrote:
Steve the rear brakes will wear more on a tow vehicle. The trailer shifts wieght forward and increases the tongue weight and holds the tow vehicles rear suspension loaded. This effectively lessens the amount of work on the front and increases rear work load.


Oh yeah - Steve do you have one of those brake bias levers that attaches to the rear axle, changing the bias based on the height of the rear suspension?

_________________
91 RallyX Audi Coupe Quattro
89 A-Team Astro-van demo derby winner at 2011 NC State Fair (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MrZqwENRqU)
Broken 89 Subaru GL-10 RallyX turbo wagon - need to sell it and all my parts cars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:31 pm
Posts: 1173
steve remchak wrote:
next week it goes to ...................... WWDDD


what would donnie darko do? david duke? doris day?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:16 pm 
Offline
Republican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 4356
Location: MWI/MUI Kubota FTW
Jason Tower wrote:
steve remchak wrote:
next week it goes to ...................... WWDDD


what would donnie darko do? david duke? doris day?


why, Doris Day would sing Que Sera, Sera; Jason

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZbKHDPPrrc

_________________
BenchWarmer Motorsports

another one of those damn LeMons heads

just another Chump :)

we are an Autocross Club Dammit............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:18 pm 
Offline
Republican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 4356
Location: MWI/MUI Kubota FTW
RichardNuss wrote:
Bernie Baake wrote:
Steve the rear brakes will wear more on a tow vehicle. The trailer shifts wieght forward and increases the tongue weight and holds the tow vehicles rear suspension loaded. This effectively lessens the amount of work on the front and increases rear work load.


Oh yeah - Steve do you have one of those brake bias levers that attaches to the rear axle, changing the bias based on the height of the rear suspension?


seriously Richard? you have a brake bias adjustment on your tow vehicles. damn, ya just cain't f*** with money. :P

_________________
BenchWarmer Motorsports

another one of those damn LeMons heads

just another Chump :)

we are an Autocross Club Dammit............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 347
Location: Apex, NC
steve remchak wrote:
RichardNuss wrote:
Bernie Baake wrote:
Steve the rear brakes will wear more on a tow vehicle. The trailer shifts wieght forward and increases the tongue weight and holds the tow vehicles rear suspension loaded. This effectively lessens the amount of work on the front and increases rear work load.


Oh yeah - Steve do you have one of those brake bias levers that attaches to the rear axle, changing the bias based on the height of the rear suspension?


seriously Richard? you have a brake bias adjustment on your tow vehicles. damn, ya just cain't f*** with money. :P


I don't! :) Some vehicles came with this type of setup from the factory. I was wondering if you had that on yours, and if so, if it could be the cause. Not driver-adjustable. Just a lever that moves based on your rear suspension height, tied to some kind of proportioning valve that changes the pressure to the rear brakes. I tried to find a picture of it online, but didn't find one. People referred to it as a rear brake "bypass valve" or "pressure valve". *edit - Finally found the name - "load sensing proportioning valve". You can Google that.*

If you look for it under your truck, I'm sure you'll see it if you have one. Trace your rear brakeline and see if it runs through a valve like that near the rear axle.

_________________
91 RallyX Audi Coupe Quattro
89 A-Team Astro-van demo derby winner at 2011 NC State Fair (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MrZqwENRqU)
Broken 89 Subaru GL-10 RallyX turbo wagon - need to sell it and all my parts cars


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group