⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:10 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Would you like to see THSCC implement an STX-2 class
Yes 44%  44%  [ 8 ]
No 56%  56%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 18
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:30 pm 
Offline
Queen of the Guinea Hens
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 11:32 pm
Posts: 3122
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Brice, I don't think it's fair to eliminate the possibility of club-only classes simply based on the fact that their pax would be "made up." It wouldn't just be pulled out of thin air...it would be some fairly reasonable number based on the likely potential of a good car in that class that was well driven. We have enough data to give that a pretty reasonable number, so I don't think that should be anyone's concern.

I do agree that we shouldn't just make up a ton of classes that seem to fit each member's prep level along with a good pax number for said class. But that said, for something like STX2 where other folks are already doing it (along with an existing "made up" pax), I don't think it's a big deal.

But the points thing is likely something to consider, as is the fact that there might be some SCCA proposals out there in the next few months that might be worth TH adopting early (as in these would be 2010 proposals, but there's nothing stopping TH from trying them in 2009).


--Donnie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:55 pm 
Offline
Just call me Bo

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:39 pm
Posts: 1431
Location: SYPHAJFD
Donnie Barnes wrote:
...as is the fact that there might be some SCCA proposals out there in the next few months that might be worth TH adopting early (as in these would be 2010 proposals, but there's nothing stopping TH from trying them in 2009).


You're such a big tease! :D

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:00 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
I don't think it would be very difficult to come up with a reasonable PAX for such a class. Looking at the current PAX list I would go ahead and say ~0.828 erring on the side of being higher than necessary for fairness sake. Also if we did this for 2008, I would say that the class would be ineligible for season end trophies as we've already had too many events.

_________________
'07, '08, '11 Autocross VP
'06, '10 Mike Dishman Cup
'21 MX5, '13 Corvette GS, '92 Corvette 383 c.i. 413whp/390wtq, '03 Expedition


Last edited by Les Davis on Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:02 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
BriceJohnson wrote:
I also voted no, because we made the argument before that people shouldn't run "gentleman's agreements" that allow them to run a a lower class than their car truly is based on people who care about the pax results (Alex in STT is just one example). If you create a new class, with a pax that we made up, you've distorted those results.


That wouldn't be a great gentleman's agreement. One that would be is, say, for all DS drivers to run on street tires only. :wink:

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:44 pm 
Offline
Not spectacular just decent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 5:12 pm
Posts: 1213
Location: Heading back to base for debriefing and cocktails.
Wes Eargle wrote:
BriceJohnson wrote:
I also voted no, because we made the argument before that people shouldn't run "gentleman's agreements" that allow them to run a a lower class than their car truly is based on people who care about the pax results (Alex in STT is just one example). If you create a new class, with a pax that we made up, you've distorted those results.


That wouldn't be a great gentleman's agreement. One that would be is, say, for all DS drivers to run on street tires only. :wink:


I'm okay with that since I'm running in a made up X class. :P

_________________
Not spectacular just decent.
I'm not sure what I'm driving.
Maybe an ITR in DS.
Or half-assed STX prepped 330.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
Donnie Barnes wrote:
Brice, I don't think it's fair to eliminate the possibility of club-only classes simply based on the fact that their pax would be "made up." It wouldn't just be pulled out of thin air...it would be some fairly reasonable number based on the likely potential of a good car in that class that was well driven. We have enough data to give that a pretty reasonable number, so I don't think that should be anyone's concern.

I do agree that we shouldn't just make up a ton of classes that seem to fit each member's prep level along with a good pax number for said class. But that said, for something like STX2 where other folks are already doing it (along with an existing "made up" pax), I don't think it's a big deal.

But the points thing is likely something to consider, as is the fact that there might be some SCCA proposals out there in the next few months that might be worth TH adopting early (as in these would be 2010 proposals, but there's nothing stopping TH from trying them in 2009).


--Donnie


Yeah, I'm not too worried either way, just giving my opinion. I'm sure a reasonable number could be arrived upon, at least as reasonable of a number as any other pax index but it would always be open for debate as to what the number should be though b/c its not declared by an external body to the club. If some other club ran an STX-2, would we adopt their same pax or make our own up? Its something else that could be inconsistent between clubs, even if the class is being run other places.

I mean, I could always just disregard those in front of me on the pax results as a consequence, I don't think I'm gonna be taking an FTP trophy home anytime soon. . .

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:03 am 
Offline
I got a SUX2000!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 12:07 am
Posts: 2443
Location: In the garage, under a big old Mercedes
Would an S2000 qualify for this proposed "STX2" class? Not that I'm in any hurry to jump ship from AS, but it sure would ease the tire budget come 2009...

_________________
Karl S.
2014 Baby, 2014 House, 2013 Ford Focus ST, 2013 BMW 328i, 1994 Mercedes E320
(Insert passive aggressive signature line here)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:56 am 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Wes Eargle wrote:
There's an additional concern of implementing a new class when the points season has begun.


Simple. No "official" season points for 2008. Class competitors can tabulate points for the 2008 season on their own. Then do season points in 2009 if the class remains in 2008.

BriceJohnson wrote:
If you create a new class, with a pax that we made up, you've distorted those results.


Just have some knowledgeable people (probably a few national level people who don't have a dog in the fight) make a good faith effort on an accurate number. That is the best you can do. Didn't someone say some clubs are already running a STX2 class. I am sure some PAX values for this type of class are already in use elsewhere.

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:28 am 
Offline
proud papa!!1!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 6:44 pm
Posts: 2842
Location: Durham
Karl Shultz wrote:
Would an S2000 qualify for this proposed "STX2" class? Not that I'm in any hurry to jump ship from AS, but it sure would ease the tire budget come 2009...


Seems to me that it would. I recon if it ever becomes a "real" class the S2000 might end up on an exclusion list with the Elise, but that would be silly IMHO.

245 width tires is likely the limit that you can run...

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:32 pm
Posts: 238
Location: Cary
I'd say the S2000 would definitely be included in STX2

_________________
91 Miata STT #28
05 Subaru Impreza RS - The Wife's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:17 pm 
Offline
proud papa!!1!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 6:44 pm
Posts: 2842
Location: Durham
Philly Region SCCA wrote:
12. STU2 regional class


STU2 is a regional class administered by Doug Riordan that will be superseded should the SCCA decide to implement an identical or similar class. It is intended to attract popular 2-seat, 2+2, and 4-seat cars that are natural fits for STU, but are excluded. STU2 follows the STU rule set. This class extends the Street Touring concept to appropriate cars that are inelgible for STS2 and not classed in Super Stock (i.e. appropriate cars from AS, BS, and CS are the target participants). See the sample inclusion list below. Exclusion list: Any car currently classed in Super Stock and non-stock eligible cars. For 2008 PAX for STU2 will be .845. Drivers in STU2 will not be eligible for the Driver of the Year (DOY) award in the class' first year of existence as it is an experimental regional class. Moreover STU2's PAX will be reevaluated in the middle of season and adjusted if deemed necessary.

Sample inclusion list:

* BMW M Coupe & Roadster (01+)
* BMW Z4
* BMW Z4 Coupe (07+)
* Chevrolet Corvette C4 (84-96)
* Chevrolet Corvette ZR-1
* Honda S2000 (any)
* Pontiac Solstice GXP
* Porsche Boxster (any)
* Porsche Cayman Non-S
* Saturn Sky Redline
* BMW M Coupe & Roadster (96-00)
* BMW Z3 6cyl NOC
* Mazda RX-7 Turbo (87-91)
* Nissan 300ZX Turbo (90+)
* Nissan 350Z
* Toyota MR2 Turbo
* Mazda Miata (99+)
* Toyota MR2 (91-95 and 00+)
* all STU eligible vehicles
* all STS2 eligible vehicles
* all CS eligible vehicles excluded by STS2

Sample exclusion list:

* BMW M3 Lightweight
* BMW M Roadster (06+)
* BMW Z4 M Coupe/Roadster (07+)
* Chevrolet Corvette C5 (97+)
* Chevrolet Corvette C6 (05+)
* Lotus Elise (05+)
* Lamborghini (NOC)
* Porsche Boxster S (05+)
* Porsche Cayman S (06+)


That is how one region does it (calling it STU2). They also don't have many folks running it :( I actually think that running it under the STX ruleset and allowing all qualifying cars (except the Elise) would be better. A Miata doesn't stand a chance against an S2000 when the tire restrictions are removed, however, a Miata on 245 street tires might be able to keep up with an S2000 on the same width street tires. The 295 width restriction in STU negates the advantage of lighter weight and low power.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group