Donnie Barnes wrote:
I agree with Chris completely. Protests don't have to be horrible things. IMHO, what should happen is:
. competitor with problem should talk to the other competitor as soon as possible
. if there can be no friendly resolution, then file a protest
. those in charge should do what they can to adjudicate the protest while keeping everyone as friendly as possible
In 99% of the cases, the first step will end up clarifying a misunderstanding for *someone* and life will move on with either a correction at the next event or a dropping of the whole thing. But if you believe someone else is doing something that's against the rules and giving them some kind of competitive advantage (even if it's just small weight savings) and they won't fix the problem, you have every right to a fair and friendly protest. Even if the officers believe the "small weight savings" was negligible, they should handle the protest in a nice manner (without any nut kicking, at least!). And if their answer is "come on, we're talking two pounds here, you're gonna have to get over it", then get over it.
But I really don't think we should be threatening people to not protest. It doesn't need to be like that. I know you guys are really just joking around and trying to put some amount of pressure out there to avoid the truly weenie protest over a shift knob in stock or something, but I just think it needs to be said that protests aren't horrible things.
--Donnie
Sheesh guys, when did the subject of this thread change from "Foglights in ST* classes" to "protestors suck"?
Donnie, Regardless as to how my comments were interpreted, I don't disagree with any part of what you said, and couldn't have said it better, you nailed it on the head, etc... etc... etc...
Protests are definitely a valid part of the dispute process that the staff will take seriously should it come to that, and in no way should my previous comments be construed to suggest otherwise.