⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:11 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:30 pm 
Offline
AADD
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:04 pm
Posts: 2059
JamesFeinberg wrote:
Les Davis wrote:
IMO "horsepower courses" to me are course that allow long stretches of acceleration and this one had that in spades.


I think that's where we have the slight disconnect in our respective "definitions." I look at horsepower courses in the same way but only if those long bursts of acceleration are followed by a huge braking zone leading into another huge acceleration zone. I didn't feel like any of the braking zones on the taxiway were that long meaning the relative speed through the slaloms was not too far off the relative approach speed.


I agree that long acceleration zone followed by long hard braking is ultimately what makes an ideal horsepower course but where are you gonna find that? Only place I know of is not AX but HPDE. However long acceleration zones followed by only moderate braking zones gives those with big horsepower some advantage as well. Its the long/numerous acceleration zones that are quite rare that set this course apart for me. Fact is your wrong and your just gonna have to come to terms with that. :wink:

JamesFeinberg wrote:
Even at the end of the taxiway, I couldn't use full throttle after the braking zone all the way around to the entry to the 3-cone slalom on the main runway so that acceleration zone had to be tempered with some judicious throttle modulation. If anybody was full throttle around that entire section it leads me to believe they weren't going fast enough on entry, they took a long round-about line or they were driving a slow AWD car. Wink


I find it puzzling that you were unable to use full throttle at all through there. Must be something with the silly FWD. I'm quite certain I was between 1/2 and 3/4 throttle all the way to the first gate on the runway and foot to floor from there to the three cone slalom. I did give up a lot of speed braking at the end of the taxiway but I don't think I slowed too much and Aaron even specifically commented at how much more aggressively I attacked that area. To be full throttle through the gates on the left before the three cone slalom required a somewhat more "graceful big arch" line but I don't think I added any significant distance, it just allowed me to turn wwwwaaaayyyy early for the gate and head straight for the slalom maybe someone who rode with me (Aaron) can comment.


Last edited by Les Davis on Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:02 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:44 pm 
Offline
Token nudist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 11:42 am
Posts: 2623
Location: Lost in Eastern N. Carolina
All I know is the course was fun and on my third run I didn't hit the brake from the left off the taxiway to the finish in third gear. I even managed to stop afterwards without completely making squares out of my tyres. :roll:

Interestingly, I did tap the brakes on my 4th run which was my fastest if I hadn't hit the stupid cone on the taxiway, but I'm not smart enough to know whether that was because I was faster on the taxiway or the runway. One of these days I may be competent enough to be able to analyze differences in runs besides saying "Well, I was faster because I didn't slip and hit the gas and brake at the same time on this run" :oops:

_________________
1990 Faded Reddish CSP Lite Miata
2002 Electron Blue Corvette Z06
2005 Mazda 6 Wagon
2003 Nissan Pathfinder DTV (Dog Transport Vehicle)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:10 pm 
Offline
Just call me Bo

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:39 pm
Posts: 1431
Location: SYPHAJFD
Les Davis wrote:
Fact is your wrong and your just gonna have to come to terms with that. :wink:


Dude, if I could come to terms with when I am wrong (which is never!) I probably wouldn't be rapidly approaching the big "four oh" and still single! :P

Les Davis wrote:
I find it puzzling that you were unable to use full throttle at all through there.


I didn't explain myself very well. I was full throttle right after turn-in onto the crossover but then I had to breathe the throttle for my turn-in onto the main runway. I was then full throttle again for a bit before I had to breathe it some more to stay on my line. Somewhere before the first gate, I was able to floor it again and then I had to shift it into third at which point I was flat-foot all the way to the 3-cone slalom.

I probably should have said I couldn't flat-foot it all the way from the crossover to the 3-cone slalom. Anybody that could falls under one of the 3 scenarios I listed in my previous post. Or an alien and my new hero. :lol:

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:37 pm 
Offline
I err on the side of being stupid
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 10:15 pm
Posts: 4743
Location: Greenville, NC
JamesFeinberg wrote:
I didn't explain myself very well. I was full throttle right after turn-in onto the crossover but then I had to breathe the throttle for my turn-in onto the main runway. I was then full throttle again for a bit before I had to breathe it some more to stay on my line. Somewhere before the first gate, I was able to floor it again and then I had to shift it into third at which point I was flat-foot all the way to the 3-cone slalom.

I probably should have said I couldn't flat-foot it all the way from the crossover to the 3-cone slalom. Anybody that could falls under one of the 3 scenarios I listed in my previous post. Or an alien and my new hero. :lol:

Jim


I understood it because that sounds EXACTLY like I did it.

Even trying to be full throttle turning OFF the Xover onto the runway would have had me on the Tweetsie Railroad.

My just doesnt like to turn that well....... yet.

_________________
02 Focus SVT
STF 9


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:27 pm 
Offline
Badass

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 10:24 am
Posts: 494
FWIW, I flatted footed Karl's S2000 from the exit of the 180 to the 3-cone slalom on my last three runs. Upon exiting the 180 I did need a slight and short lift. Once the car was settled on exit I upshifted to 3rd. The 3-cone really didn't require a much of a brake, just a quick brush, and then it was hard back on the gas...but, Karl's car was handling like it was on rails.

Eric


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:23 am 
Offline
I got a SUX2000!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 12:07 am
Posts: 2443
Location: In the garage, under a big old Mercedes
Eric Peterson wrote:
FWIW, I flatted footed Karl's S2000 from the exit of the 180 to the 3-cone slalom on my last three runs. Upon exiting the 180 I did need a slight and short lift. Once the car was settled on exit I upshifted to 3rd. The 3-cone really didn't require a much of a brake, just a quick brush, and then it was hard back on the gas...but, Karl's car was handling like it was on rails.

Eric


Obviously I didn't execute it as well, but yeah - this sounds exactly right. The moment I could see daylight out of the "big 180" on the far side, I was full throttle. Quick upshift to third gear as I bent the car left for that next offset, and we're literally "off to the races." Very little slowing down was required elsewhere on the main runway (even though I made that mistake on at least one run).

I really liked the course a lot. But to me, it wasn't so much about placing the car precisely in "this spot." It felt more like I was managing speed given the constraints of having to get to that gate over there, without jeopardizing my ability to make the one after that, and the one after that.

Ah, what do I know...once I typed that out, it sort of seemed like they were about the same thing...

_________________
Karl S.
2014 Baby, 2014 House, 2013 Ford Focus ST, 2013 BMW 328i, 1994 Mercedes E320
(Insert passive aggressive signature line here)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 510
Location: Raleigh, NC
This is the first course that I have used 3rd gear, and it nearly scared the stuffing out of me. Walking the course, it was hard for me to figure out how fast I would be going on the runway. At those speeds smooth transitions are really important and I think I was too hard on the brakes which upset the car. I spun out twice with nice dirt slide on my first run of the day. I was begining to think if I had flat spotted my tires a few more times, they would nearly be round again. :lol:

Anyway, it was a humbling day for me.

_________________
2003 Subaru WRX Sportwagon = daily driver/boost and booster seats
2000 BMW 540iT = wife's kid hauler
2012 Toyota Highlander = the boring reliable vehicle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:44 am 
Offline
Honda >> Ford
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 1:54 am
Posts: 2052
I'd like about 50 more tries at that course to experiment with lines out of the crossover. I intended to make an arc out of it to open up the path through the first two gates on the runway, like Les, and I think I was doing a decent job of that during the official runs, but I could not find 3rd gear while in that sweeper on runs 2-4. I did find 5th once, and fortunately I didn't find 1st. :shock: Finally, on my last fun run I carried 2nd to the end of the sweeper, and found 3rd easily. Maybe the centering springs on my shifter are weak (that's what the guy at Carolina Mustang said, but he wants to sell me a Tri-Ax), perhaps it's another symptom of the worn 3rd gear syncho. Since the shifter bolts directly to the top of the tranny, I doubt it's a cornering induced shift linkage misalignment. Of course, my rear axle (housing, the whole thing) moves side to side quite a bit, so maybe it was pulling the transmission & engine sideways on their mounts, causing a driver to shifter misalignment. Maybe I should stop
:deadhorse:.
I'm open to co-drive offers :)

Anyway, it was a really fun course, and we need a pair of 10x50 binoculars in the bus to read car numbers.

_________________
Art McDonald
Premier Amateur #518
2008 Dishman Cup
Pivot Cone Snob

Rodney is a waxer (but in a good way)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:32 am 
Offline
I miss my Type-R
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:15 pm
Posts: 386
Location: Whispering Pines
Chris Brown wrote:
how do we get better about making sure everyone has large enough car numbers and letters? seems like no matter how much we talk about it in driver's meetings and on the forum, some folks seem hell bent on bringing unreadable magnetics.

is this something i should be failing cars at tech for? Should the starter be enforcing it at the line?


You can't fix stupid. It's not complicated to understand, some folks just don't care.

_________________
Phil... Now I miss the ITR and the M3!!!
1990 Honda Civic SI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 230
Location: ILM
PhilFausz wrote:
Chris Brown wrote:
how do we get better about making sure everyone has large enough car numbers and letters? seems like no matter how much we talk about it in driver's meetings and on the forum, some folks seem hell bent on bringing unreadable magnetics.

is this something i should be failing cars at tech for? Should the starter be enforcing it at the line?


You can't fix stupid. It's not complicated to understand, some folks just don't care.


Maybe we should put those people in the bus during an event and make them work T&S a bit. I think they'll learn real fast about having proper #s! :twisted:

_________________
GS - 17 Honda Civic Si
STS - 91 Honda Civic Si
S04 - 00 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS

http://www.kestrelracing.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:23 pm
Posts: 1331
Location: Probably somewhere near an autocross.
Jeff Eng wrote:
PhilFausz wrote:
Chris Brown wrote:
how do we get better about making sure everyone has large enough car numbers and letters? seems like no matter how much we talk about it in driver's meetings and on the forum, some folks seem hell bent on bringing unreadable magnetics.

is this something i should be failing cars at tech for? Should the starter be enforcing it at the line?


You can't fix stupid. It's not complicated to understand, some folks just don't care.


Maybe we should put those people in the bus during an event and make them work T&S a bit. I think they'll learn real fast about having proper #s! :twisted:


Won't work. If they don't care if their numbers can be seen, why would they care if they see and record other's numbers correctly? It's the same as those who come to run, but don't show up for worker assignments. X2 What Phil said!

_________________
SCCA Solo Triad Award Recipient 2014
SCCA HSL National Champion 2012
SCCA DSL National Champion 2013
SCCA DSL National Champion 2014
NCR National Driver of the Year 2012
THSCC Heel of the Year 2011
Former Club Secretary
http://www.petscompanioninn.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 222
Location: Duke University
Arthur McDonald wrote:
I doubt it's a cornering induced shift linkage misalignment.


When I drove my 325Ci at Spartanburg, after getting used to the 944, I couldn't downshift into second and couldn't figure out why.

I was just too stressed out and I was pulling it over into the R gate! Once I relaxed (this took serious conscious effort) it would go in fine.

R 1 3 5
^ 2 4
|
mystery gear

Same thing happened last weekend- I was heel-toeing too fast and wasn't leaving the clutch out in neutral long enough before I tried to go back to second, so the tranny wasn't spun up and it wouldn't go. Finally got it towards the end of the day though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:57 am 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
PhilFausz wrote:
Chris Brown wrote:
how do we get better about making sure everyone has large enough car numbers and letters? seems like no matter how much we talk about it in driver's meetings and on the forum, some folks seem hell bent on bringing unreadable magnetics.

is this something i should be failing cars at tech for? Should the starter be enforcing it at the line?


You can't fix stupid. It's not complicated to understand, some folks just don't care.


We need a taser.

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:38 pm 
Offline
I miss my Type-R
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:15 pm
Posts: 386
Location: Whispering Pines
Wes Eargle wrote:
PhilFausz wrote:
Chris Brown wrote:
how do we get better about making sure everyone has large enough car numbers and letters? seems like no matter how much we talk about it in driver's meetings and on the forum, some folks seem hell bent on bringing unreadable magnetics.

is this something i should be failing cars at tech for? Should the starter be enforcing it at the line?


You can't fix stupid. It's not complicated to understand, some folks just don't care.


We need a taser.


Yes! Outstanding idea. When I was worker coordinator, I asked if we could beat those who deserved it, but it got denied. A taser, some pepper spray, either one is good for me. If anyone has a police dog, that would also work well, and as a bonus, the blood trail out to the worker station would serve as a reminder to the others!!!

If they don't care to do what's right, then it comes down to motivation. If we don't have proper motivation tools available, they will not change their behavior. Take folks who do not work. To me, if they show up again, they should work two heats (one for today and one make up) before they're allowed to drive. The problem with that is that unless the worker coordinator remembers the name, they get no penalty other than DNW for times.

There, I almost feel better now.

_________________
Phil... Now I miss the ITR and the M3!!!
1990 Honda Civic SI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:50 pm 
Offline
Rookie phenom
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Posts: 1792
Location: Raleigh, NC
PhilFausz wrote:
Wes Eargle wrote:
PhilFausz wrote:
Chris Brown wrote:
how do we get better about making sure everyone has large enough car numbers and letters? seems like no matter how much we talk about it in driver's meetings and on the forum, some folks seem hell bent on bringing unreadable magnetics.

is this something i should be failing cars at tech for? Should the starter be enforcing it at the line?


You can't fix stupid. It's not complicated to understand, some folks just don't care.


We need a taser.


Yes! Outstanding idea. When I was worker coordinator, I asked if we could beat those who deserved it, but it got denied. A taser, some pepper spray, either one is good for me. If anyone has a police dog, that would also work well, and as a bonus, the blood trail out to the worker station would serve as a reminder to the others!!!

If they don't care to do what's right, then it comes down to motivation. If we don't have proper motivation tools available, they will not change their behavior. Take folks who do not work. To me, if they show up again, they should work two heats (one for today and one make up) before they're allowed to drive. The problem with that is that unless the worker coordinator remembers the name, they get no penalty other than DNW for times.

There, I almost feel better now.


Lighten up, Francis.

_________________
Jim Pastorius
2008 Silverado VortecMax
1992 Camaro CMC#92
2002 BMW R1150R

2009 3rd Place CMC Mid-Atlantic Championship
2009 CMC Hyperfest Winner


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group