Donnie Barnes wrote:
Dick, apparently you'd be surprised just how easy it is to look and compare segment times and line choice with the MaxQData between runs. I *could* do it with the DL-1, but it would be a little more of a rush and fiddling to be pulling the data card, copying files, loading up, etc. With the MaxQData you are storing to the PDA anyway, so you just grab it and start looking at data. (You can even store straight to a laptop in the car for even more in depth analysis, but that's got the obvious drawback of having to strap a laptop down safely somewhere.)
--Donnie
Donnie,
That is good to hear. The MaxQgps certainly seems like something I could use in the race car since it is "small and selfpowered" plus easy to review between runs (after cleaning tires, catching my breath, etc.

). How are the onscreen controls in regard to shaky hands after a CM dose of adrenalin

) Since I rarely have a codriver what I would use is a quick review of my runs in regard to the g's in the areas I tend to be too conservative (corner entry and slaloms).
Chuck,
I agree that adjusting the GEEZ maps can be a challenge. I did find that getting the end speed correct frequently would get mine close enough to identify the various peak g areas that I would then use for segment time analysis.
All,
If I get hooked again on autocross the MaxQgps looks like a REALLY good tool for "at event between runs" troubleshooting to help find where the speed is hiding, with or without a quick codriver to compare with.
However, if the goal is also car setup info, something like the DL1 or the higher price MaxQ devices which have lots of sensors for suspension movement, revs, throttle position, etc. obviously are probably an essential tool these days. However, you may need to be a race car engineer to really utilize the data.
For me, at a multiday event (Pro Solo, etc.) I'm probably better off using the analysis time for a better night's sleep.
Dick