BriceJohnson wrote:
I know this is gonna blow people's minds here, but. . .
There are things that are important other than just autocrossing when it comes to a car. NO, I didn't buy the second set of wheels for autocross. I bought the second set of wheels b/c they look better and I like them, and I run them on the street with a more sensible street tire (BFG G-force sports, 340 treadwear rating). With so many mazda3's running around, I like to have something to differentiate mine..
Sooo You don't want to spend more money for auto-cross... but you will spend more money for your car for looks, yet you are down on people who might spend more for auto-cross that looks? I understand wanting the car to look nice and I have not problem with that, I don't understand how you can complain that if we were to eliminate the tire class that you would have to compete against people put money towards their car for auto-x, just because they have different priorities.
Running R comps is not as expensive as you make it, My first set of R-comps and ties cost me 200 Shipped to my door for 4 tires and rims (yes they were used) In my whole racing career I have bought 1 set of new R comps. I have used, used tires most of the time. If I keep running the del sol and when I run out of the used tires that are under my house I will probably have to buy my second set of new R comps, since most people are not running on 14 inch R comps any more. The other day I saw a post for some 17 R comps that were slightly used for $200 dollars for the whole set.
If ran H Stock with your current tires, Say running R comps vs Street tires with Mary, Bernie and I in the class, if your Street tires were 1.5 sec slower than Mary, you may still place second, because at some events Mary has laid the beat down on us by over a second or 2 more than once.