⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:11 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 178 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
Jason Mauldin wrote:
BriceJohnson wrote:
Wes Eargle wrote:
BriceJohnson wrote:
argh, I KNOW I need to improve as a driver, but a classing argument doesn't address the driver skill issue at all, and shouldn't

as you yourself pointed out


DING! DING! DING!

So has the little lightbulb clicked over your head Tom and Jerry style, or do you still feel the need for your own little sandbox?


what are you trying to say? The classing argument has been over a stock car with street tires not having to run in open class, and having a more sensible class for it. I've yet to hear anyone debate the FACT that a mini on r-compounds would kill a mazda3 on street tires. . .
A MINI on r-comps will also kill a Honda Accord on r-comps. Should we create a class for that as well?


no, I realize that I am arguing for my specific situation, but I also realize that my specific situation isn't as contrived as the Honda Accord on R compounds, I have a stock car, on street tires, and I'd like to be able to run it in a class that I'd be competitive in. Lets take the different cars out of the equation to simplify things. Would anyone dispute that driver skill being equal, a mazda3 on R compounds would beat a mazda3 on street tires?

I realize the "me class" argument that Richard is making, but I fail to see how asking for a class for a stock car on street tires is being selfish, seems like a situation that a lot of people would be in (looked like 9 of us at the last even by my count. . .)

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Last edited by BriceJohnson on Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
Wes Eargle wrote:
I think that Buckley would beat you in your car as is with you driving a Mini on V710s.


interesting trash talk, but irrelevant to this argument, as I stated earlier, classing arguments all assume equal driver skill. . .

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:51 pm 
Offline
Stalker's boyfriend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:35 pm
Posts: 2858
Location: Looking for Chuck on the Intraweb
BriceJohnson wrote:

sounds like you have issue with the numbers chosen for pax indices then, for properly chosen pax indexes would have you TIE if you ran the same course in those two cars. Admittedly, choosing a pax index is an imprecise process, but so is choosing what cars go into what open class. . .


I have no problem with the indices, for they are correct for what they were created from: National level events with cars and drivers (in most cases :)) with the highest prep level.

I don't think Rick Ruth factors in that someone might take a stock Mini Cooper and run HS in a TIR class in NC.

I do get pretty frustrated when you complain that you can't be competitive in STS with an underprepped car. Click on the following links and scroll down to STS results:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

The list can go on. My '01 Celica had one mod: drop springs in the rear. I had no coilovers, no power mods. I was running on stock ride height and Azenis.

The driver is 90% of this sport. - AB

_________________
'14 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 4WD
Super Westerfield Bros - '93 Integra - LeChump Du Jour
STX 93 - Scion FR-S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:53 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
BriceJohnson wrote:
Wes Eargle wrote:
I think that Buckley would beat you in your car as is with you driving a Mini on V710s.


interesting trash talk, but irrelevant to this argument, as I stated earlier, classing arguments all assume equal driver skill. . .


No, interesting trash talk would be the standard $5 a tenth bet that AB does.

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:56 pm 
Offline
Not spectacular just decent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 5:12 pm
Posts: 1213
Location: Heading back to base for debriefing and cocktails.
When did it drop to $5?

_________________
Not spectacular just decent.
I'm not sure what I'm driving.
Maybe an ITR in DS.
Or half-assed STX prepped 330.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
Aaron Buckley wrote:
BriceJohnson wrote:
The list can go on. My '01 Celica had one mod: drop springs in the rear. I had no coilovers, no power mods. I was running on stock ride height and Azenis.

The driver is 90% of this sport. - AB


congratulations, nice driving

this is a classing argument though, an argument about that last 10%. I will work on the 90% on my own, I don't need you to tell me how bad of a driver I am to "inspire me", trust me, I'm working on that on my own.

This debate is a classing argument though, lets please leave derogatory comments about my driving, OR self agrandising posts about "how great of a driver I was" off of this post, and address the topic at hand.

btw, congratulations, you are the 1,000,000th person to tell me that autocross is 90% driver

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Last edited by BriceJohnson on Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:03 pm 
Offline
Stalker's boyfriend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:35 pm
Posts: 2858
Location: Looking for Chuck on the Intraweb
BriceJohnson wrote:

congratulations, nice driving

this is a classing argument though, an argument about that last 10%. I will work on the 90% on my own, I don't need you to tell me how bad of a driver I am to "inspire me", trust me, I'm working on that on my own.

This debate is a classing argument though, lets please leave derogatory comments about my driving, OR self agrandising posts about "how great of a driver I was" off of this post, and address the topic at hand.


There is nothing I posted that states anything about your driving skill. What I am saying is an underprepped car for a class with all other cars with street tires is not that big a disadvantage.

I am confident that your car in it's current state can trophy in STS. - AB

_________________
'14 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 4WD
Super Westerfield Bros - '93 Integra - LeChump Du Jour
STX 93 - Scion FR-S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:04 pm 
Offline
Stalker's boyfriend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:35 pm
Posts: 2858
Location: Looking for Chuck on the Intraweb
David Spratte wrote:
When did it drop to $5?


At local events, it's $5 a tenth. At National events, it kicks up to $10 a tenth. My co-driver and I did away with that this year to focus more on getting the car right, but I think it might return for Nationals. - AB

_________________
'14 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 4WD
Super Westerfield Bros - '93 Integra - LeChump Du Jour
STX 93 - Scion FR-S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:33 am
Posts: 2230
I agree its not THAT big of a disadvantage, but it IS a disadvantage, when we are discussing classing, these small advantages are what we are talking about. Don't get me wrong, I know that my biggest area for improvement is in improving my driving, but that doesn't keep me from wanting to win at whatever I do. Certainly, beating up on less experienced drivers is no fun, but thats not where I am yet. Once I win TIR, then I'll consider moving my underprepped car to the STS, but for now, I'd like to stick with those with whom I have good competition (I would have finished 3rd in TIR if I had an HS pax, so even within that class I have room for improvement). I treat it like NOV2, especially since I never had a chance to run in NOV in this car (I trophied in my integra like 4 years ago in NOV, making me ineligible)

_________________
2012 MX-5 Sport SUV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:13 pm 
Offline
JACKASS!!!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 3683
So from reading your posts, you concede that there are alternatives for you to run your current car with street tires, but you want TIR to stick around just so you have a better chance of trophying? Doesn't this seem a bit selfish and odd to you on any level?

_________________
Has no responsibility whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm 
Offline
Big Cheese of TSCC

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:01 pm
Posts: 5
I'm going to play devil's advocate here because it seems like several important things are being overlooked. I'm not a THSCC member, but I don't expect that to devalue the points I'm going to make. I normally don't have a dog in this fight...

#1. There have been 10+ entries in TIR for most of the events. That's not a small class. A core group of people obviously enjoy running that class and with that kind of participation why would you want to dissolve it?

#2. The PAX argument is irrelevant to TIR unless you make it relevant to all your other PAX classes (LAD, X). Novice is the exception here.

#3. Increasing competition in open classes. Why have a "X" or LAD class then. These people should have to go back to open class just like the TIR competitors. Their results are based off the same indexes as TIR and their entry #'s are less. Maybe the presence of some X class competitors back in the open classes will push the open class competitors a little harder. Or it could scare them off, much like it would possibly scare off some TIR competitors to go to open class. LAD is much like TIR class, but based on driver instead of tire choice. Are you willing to tell the ladies that they should have to run in open classes because they have no real reason to be seperate? That's the argument being made for TIR.

#4. Making better drivers. This should be a goal of all AutoX clubs and members, but it shouldn't be forced on everyone. If you've got a highly competitive class (the TIR PAX times were just as tightly contested as any other open class) it serves the purpose. The TIR competitors are more in competition with themselves than other cars. They know they are relying on a PAX index so their only assurance is to drive as fast as they possibly can every time.

_________________
Justin B.
TSCC Pres.
#12 FSP Mazda Protege5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:35 pm 
Offline
Stalker's boyfriend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:35 pm
Posts: 2858
Location: Looking for Chuck on the Intraweb
Justin Barbry wrote:
I'm going to play devil's advocate here because it seems like several important things are being overlooked. I'm not a THSCC member, but I don't expect that to devalue the points I'm going to make. I normally don't have a dog in this fight...

#1. There have been 10+ entries in TIR for most of the events. That's not a small class. A core group of people obviously enjoy running that class and with that kind of participation why would you want to dissolve it?

#2. The PAX argument is irrelevant to TIR unless you make it relevant to all your other PAX classes (LAD, X). Novice is the exception here.

#3. Increasing competition in open classes. Why have a "X" or LAD class then. These people should have to go back to open class just like the TIR competitors. Their results are based off the same indexes as TIR and their entry #'s are less. Maybe the presence of some X class competitors back in the open classes will push the open class competitors a little harder. Or it could scare them off, much like it would possibly scare off some TIR competitors to go to open class. LAD is much like TIR class, but based on driver instead of tire choice. Are you willing to tell the ladies that they should have to run in open classes because they have no real reason to be seperate? That's the argument being made for TIR.

#4. Making better drivers. This should be a goal of all AutoX clubs and members, but it shouldn't be forced on everyone. If you've got a highly competitive class (the TIR PAX times were just as tightly contested as any other open class) it serves the purpose. The TIR competitors are more in competition with themselves than other cars. They know they are relying on a PAX index so their only assurance is to drive as fast as they possibly can every time.


1) Yes, 10+ cars is a large class. Why dissolve it then? It's not fulfilling what it was originally intended to when it was created back in the mid 90's, and the PAX favor cars with easier pax.

2) In X class, one assumes that they are running a fully prepped car, thus the pax is relevant. Ladies class I won't comment on. TIR the current PAX index doesn't work for, so you will need to create a completely new one with street tires factored in.

3) If I had my choice, there wouldn't be a Ladies or X class. There is nothing about my sexuality that makes me a better/lesser driver.

4) Yes, making better drivers is the goal, but that doesn't mean if they don't want to, we keep around NOV2 for those that don't want to improve to play in. - AB

_________________
'14 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 4WD
Super Westerfield Bros - '93 Integra - LeChump Du Jour
STX 93 - Scion FR-S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:52 pm 
Offline
Retired Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 3276
Location: Durham, NC
Ok, I just locked the thread. I am sorry if I ended up giving random person X the last word on this and person Y was just about to post a witty reply and now they can’t. My quick explanation as to why I locked this is...

1. There is very little new information at this point. I think most everything has been said by now and we are just rehashing and rearguing the same points over and over again.

2. We were just starting to delve into just as heated topics such as “why should we have LAD class”, etc. Basically the thread was not heading toward a warm and fuzzy place.

3. This is a topic that most likely the people participating have an opinion and they are not going to change one way or the other. And I don’t think it was particularly educational for those on the fence watching the train wreck.

4. This is becoming a situation in which generally everyone is playing by the rules (no personal attacks, etc.) but it was gravitating toward a single person standing in a room (that he is free to leave but chooses not to) and is taking body blow after body blow. And more and more people were entering the fray with it becoming more and more one sided. (No implied comment here on who is wrong or right on this topic)

My suggestion is for those who have strong feelings on this should attend a club meeting and take this up with the officers. Everything here is just talk and is not official club business. This thread was not going to resolve the question of TIR class next year.

_________________
Richard Casto
1972 Porsche 914
2013 Honda Fit Sport
2015 Honda Fit EX
http://motorsport.zyyz.com
Money can't buy happiness, but somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 178 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group