⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:10 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:04 am 
Offline
SUPER Post Whore

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:19 pm
Posts: 914
Location: Durham, NC
Ryan Holton wrote:
CosbyWood wrote:
Todd Breakey wrote:
CosbyWood wrote:
Noticed that the Evo did get put in STU after all. Didn't look like it would have mattered either way. :?


He will have me to blame for that. The way I looked at it was like this, if the competitors say something to me about it, then it gets changed. Autocross is supposed to be policed by yourself and your peers. So when I heard several people talking about it, I fixed it. I'll probably get a nasty-gram from him because of it. Oh well. :shrug:

Who cares if he tries to blame anyone. He's got noone to blame but himself. His car isn't designed for STX even from the factory. You have numerous people tell you that you're in the wrong class and even tell you which class you were suppose to be in. You still get owned by lesser cars in the class you weren't suppose to be in. You still gripe about being told to change classes all day. Seems pretty cut and dry to me. :lol: Good call Todd. :thumbsup:


To the EVO drivers defense, he really is a good guy. He was sooooo stuck on STX because a certain EX-AXVP (not in attendence) told him it was STX.

Names removed to protect the innocent Jason Mauldin


Well, obviously, according to Jason, the STi should be in STX as well.

I vote we just move the STis to STX, and I have no issue with it. :)

- dow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 9:01 pm
Posts: 230
Location: ILM
Todd Breakey wrote:
CosbyWood wrote:
Noticed that the Evo did get put in STU after all. Didn't look like it would have mattered either way. :?


He will have me to blame for that. The way I looked at it was like this, if the competitors say something to me about it, then it gets changed. Autocross is supposed to be policed by yourself and your peers. So when I heard several people talking about it, I fixed it. I'll probably get a nasty-gram from him because of it. Oh well. :shrug:

RodneyWright wrote:
Just a note here, but in looking at the pax results and looking at the last event, I see the pax numbers are the same as the last event. I thought there was some disscussion about some of the indexs being incorrect and someone was trying to get the updated software and was going to repost the corrected numbers.

let me know if I'm off base here....


Nope, not off base. Apparently Carl and Emmie took the time to adjust the pax results for L'burg manually. (I still need to figure out a way to get the pax fixed for the official results though.) Thanks guys!!!!


Changing the class definitions in AXware shouldn't be too difficult. First download the latest class defs. from AXWARE and put the file in the folder that has contains all your event data. Then go to the setup menu in AXWARE and select "class definitions". A dialog box will pop up that will show all the class index times (which can be edited manually) and a way to load a new file. You just select the file and you're done.

As mentioned, if you need to customize the file for specfic thscc classes, you can open up the class definitions in AXWARE and change the index numbers manually.

Jeff

_________________
GS - 17 Honda Civic Si
STS - 91 Honda Civic Si
S04 - 00 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS

http://www.kestrelracing.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:42 am 
Offline
I HATE hatchbacks!

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 11:03 am
Posts: 11818
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Brian Herring wrote:

Well, obviously, according to Jason, the STi should be in STX as well.

I vote we just move the STis to STX, and I have no issue with it. :)

- dow


Shut up, fools!! The STi, has a larger then 2.0L engine. I even told him that I thought it was strange that all the STis run in STU, but it looks like the EVO fit the requirements perfectly.

Class exclusion lists are ghey. If you don't want a car in that class, then design the rules around it. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

_________________
In need of car.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:00 am 
Offline
Keeper of the Noobs!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:04 pm
Posts: 249
Location: Boston!
Quote:
M3!

_________________
traded the ultimate driving machine for a hatchback.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:05 pm
Posts: 2474
Location: 21st century digital boy...
Brian Herring wrote:
Well, obviously, according to Jason, the STi should be in STX as well.

I vote we just move the STis to STX, and I have no issue with it. :)

- dow


If I can move my caR back to GS, that's a DEAL! :lol:

I agree with Ryan, the guy in the Evo MR was really friendly. I know because I was being outgoing hoping he's need a novice mentor. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:25 am 
Offline
SUPER Post Whore

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:19 pm
Posts: 914
Location: Durham, NC
Matt McGrain wrote:
Brian Herring wrote:
Well, obviously, according to Jason, the STi should be in STX as well.

I vote we just move the STis to STX, and I have no issue with it. :)

- dow


If I can move my caR back to GS, that's a DEAL! :lol:

I agree with Ryan, the guy in the Evo MR was really friendly. I know because I was being outgoing hoping he's need a novice mentor. 8)


Well, if he was, I would have hoped that he would have changed his class after being told directly multiple times he was in the wrong class.

Looking stupid out on course is worse than your car looking stupid due to having to change your class letters (and only the last letter).

I would like to see more Evos out there, and I am not tryin got be TOO harsh on him, but I know he was talked about this at least a few times.

- dow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:05 pm
Posts: 2474
Location: 21st century digital boy...
Brian Herring wrote:
Matt McGrain wrote:
Brian Herring wrote:
Well, obviously, according to Jason, the STi should be in STX as well.

I vote we just move the STis to STX, and I have no issue with it. :)

- dow


If I can move my caR back to GS, that's a DEAL! :lol:

I agree with Ryan, the guy in the Evo MR was really friendly. I know because I was being outgoing hoping he's need a novice mentor. 8)


Well, if he was, I would have hoped that he would have changed his class after being told directly multiple times he was in the wrong class.

Looking stupid out on course is worse than your car looking stupid due to having to change your class letters (and only the last letter).

I would like to see more Evos out there, and I am not tryin got be TOO harsh on him, but I know he was talked about this at least a few times.

- dow


I wonder why there was resentment to change from a X to a U? Sounds like an easy fix with the blue painter's tape.

It could have been worse... He could have had a faster time than all the real STX guys and gals. Could you imagine?

Seriously though, I agree, it's always important to be properly classed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:38 am 
Offline
Aww, what a cute little car!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 10:42 pm
Posts: 1064
Location: the 'quay
Brian Herring wrote:
Matt McGrain wrote:
Brian Herring wrote:
Well, obviously, according to Jason, the STi should be in STX as well.

I vote we just move the STis to STX, and I have no issue with it. :)

- dow


If I can move my caR back to GS, that's a DEAL! :lol:

I agree with Ryan, the guy in the Evo MR was really friendly. I know because I was being outgoing hoping he's need a novice mentor. 8)


Well, if he was, I would have hoped that he would have changed his class after being told directly multiple times he was in the wrong class.

Looking stupid out on course is worse than your car looking stupid due to having to change your class letters (and only the last letter).

I would like to see more Evos out there, and I am not tryin got be TOO harsh on him, but I know he was talked about this at least a few times.

- dow


he and i had a couple of conversations on this...i think that his frustration came from being told ahead of time he was STX, then having magnetics that said STX, but then having people like me tell him we *think* he should be STU. Since we didn't have a rule book at the bus, we couldn't tell him for sure.

He has a valid position...who do you believe, the ex autox vp or the dufass at the bus that tells you he ain't sure. i think he was into his 2nd run when keith q. called from the bus that it should be an stu car. he asked if he should change it, so i told him to continue running what he was running, and it would probably be changed in the computer.

_________________
05 MCS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:42 am 
Offline
I HATE hatchbacks!

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 11:03 am
Posts: 11818
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Here's the full story. He came over to my house last week and was talking about the event and that he was going to run in ESP. That threw up a red flag, because I thought they were in BSP. He found a reference on this page that lists the EVO 8 in ESP http://moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2006/stprepm.html .

He had just paid to have "ESP" printed so he could run that on his car, then I told him that it goes to BSP and the he would be better served to run in one of the street tire classes. It looked like the car fit the rules for STX exactly. Which is obviously wrong if you look at the exclusion list, which I didn't do. So, he purchased another set of class letters for "STX".

My guess is that is why he was upset. Not that it is a valid excuse.

_________________
In need of car.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:45 am 
Offline
I HATE hatchbacks!

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 11:03 am
Posts: 11818
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Oh yeah, he did call me back and I suggested that he listen to the STi guys because they understand those classes better.

_________________
In need of car.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:59 am 
Offline
I err on the side of being stupid
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 10:15 pm
Posts: 4743
Location: Greenville, NC
Jason Mauldin wrote:
Here's the full story. He came over to my house last week and was talking about the event and that he was going to run in ESP. That threw up a red flag, because I thought they were in BSP. He found a reference on this page that lists the EVO 8 in ESP http://moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2006/stprepm.html .

He had just paid to have "ESP" printed so he could run that on his car, then I told him that it goes to BSP and the he would be better served to run in one of the street tire classes. It looked like the car fit the rules for STX exactly. Which is obviously wrong if you look at the exclusion list, which I didn't do. So, he purchased another set of class letters for "STX".

My guess is that is why he was upset. Not that it is a valid excuse.


I wish Jerry Mouton would take that mis-information OFF the intarweb :evil:

_________________
02 Focus SVT
STF 9


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:34 am 
Offline
Rookie phenom
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Posts: 1792
Location: Raleigh, NC
Ryan Holton wrote:
Jason Mauldin wrote:
Here's the full story. He came over to my house last week and was talking about the event and that he was going to run in ESP. That threw up a red flag, because I thought they were in BSP. He found a reference on this page that lists the EVO 8 in ESP http://moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2006/stprepm.html .

He had just paid to have "ESP" printed so he could run that on his car, then I told him that it goes to BSP and the he would be better served to run in one of the street tire classes. It looked like the car fit the rules for STX exactly. Which is obviously wrong if you look at the exclusion list, which I didn't do. So, he purchased another set of class letters for "STX".

My guess is that is why he was upset. Not that it is a valid excuse.


I wish Jerry Mouton would take that mis-information OFF the intarweb :evil:


Why do we even link to this site from the THSCC site? We should link to the SCCA site and not some second-hand, incorrect, problem causing site. We bring these issues upon ourselves.

_________________
Jim Pastorius
2008 Silverado VortecMax
1992 Camaro CMC#92
2002 BMW R1150R

2009 3rd Place CMC Mid-Atlantic Championship
2009 CMC Hyperfest Winner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:50 am 
Offline
SUPER Post Whore

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:19 pm
Posts: 914
Location: Durham, NC
Jason Mauldin wrote:
Oh yeah, he did call me back and I suggested that he listen to the STi guys because they understand those classes better.


Was this his first time with the car, or was he a 'true' novice?

I am glad to see him there, but if he doesn't know his class (which is available once scca.com comes back up), then one of the Novice Mentors could have helped him.

I would have quickly told him he was STU. I know that it IS frustrating, but the information IS out there, and I, myself, have had to print up multiple mags for STX, STU, SO4, NO4, LAD.... so I understand that. However, IFF I don't have the right *cool looking* stuff, I WILL have paper on the side of my car and do it right the NEXT time.

I look forward to seeing him out there in the future, and IFF he is a NOV, tell him we will help him out with Nov Instructing.

- dow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 11:04 am 
Offline
I HATE hatchbacks!

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 11:03 am
Posts: 11818
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
I believe this was his first time autocrossing this car. I don't think he is a true novice, as he claims to have ran quite a few autocrosses way back before my time on this planet.

_________________
In need of car.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 11:11 am 
Offline
Rookie phenom
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Posts: 1792
Location: Raleigh, NC
Brian Herring wrote:
Was this his first time with the car, or was he a 'true' novice?

I am glad to see him there, but if he doesn't know his class (which is available once scca.com comes back up), then one of the Novice Mentors could have helped him.

I would have quickly told him he was STU. I know that it IS frustrating, but the information IS out there, and I, myself, have had to print up multiple mags for STX, STU, SO4, NO4, LAD.... so I understand that. However, IFF I don't have the right *cool looking* stuff, I WILL have paper on the side of my car and do it right the NEXT time.

I look forward to seeing him out there in the future, and IFF he is a NOV, tell him we will help him out with Nov Instructing.

- dow


Lighten up, Francis.

_________________
Jim Pastorius
2008 Silverado VortecMax
1992 Camaro CMC#92
2002 BMW R1150R

2009 3rd Place CMC Mid-Atlantic Championship
2009 CMC Hyperfest Winner


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group