Kevin Allen wrote:
Quote:
but for an autocross that analysis could be easily rendered meaningless by the driver who is often 'dirty' except for one 'clean' and fast run which would yield a good finishing position.
i believe that is spelled "Graham"
Actually, I think that's spelled "Eric Peterson"
(FTPAX with > 20 cones throughout the event)
But I would say that he & Graham are pretty even on cone-mowing ability, having ridden with both of them.

Hey you gotta be good at something. At least I beat that noob Dan at %DNF/RUN... That takes a lot of nerve edging me out on total DNFs
And Eric did win the cone mowing contest at that event you gave me the award at Kevin. Eric was just smart enough to leave early and avoid his award
Since I swapped cars this year and wanted to learn how the new car reacted on the edge I drove it that way. Plus that stupid 3rd pedal meant no more LFB like I did in the C4. The body is about the same length but wider. The wheel base is longer and wider. So I clipped a lot of cones with one of the rear wheels often.
So following that theory. I decided to use the brakes as little as possible. My 1st run I would go 110% of what I thought I could do. Then on my 2nd run dial it back 10% where I made a mess and add another 10% where I hadn't. In theory make a full out 3rd run and do it clean. 4th run was just flat out fun run, yee haw!!! It served its purpose for what I wanted to learn about the car, but not how to autocross better. I know where the edge of the car is now from almost all angles and have the DNF's to prove it...
Respectfully,
- Yet Another RWD Hack