David Teague wrote:
Stacy King wrote:
Sounds like a chicken/egg thing - if they were classed competitively, more people would run them...
That is always the problem, why would classify something correctly if no one is running them? There is no guarantee that just because they were classed correctly the a bunch of people would flock to run the Z's nationally.
Absolutely there's no guarantee... and don't missunderstand... the only reason I bring up the Zs is thats what I drive currently... but the competitive juices are starting to flow and with the current classifications, it doens't make sense to try to make my car competitive (SOLO I or II)... if it were in a more appropriate class... I would be much more inclined to stick with it.
Some other 'sore thumbs' in BSP that stuck out to me:
*Triumph TR8
*Sunbeams
*Jag E-type
According to this
http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2005/stprepc.html (not sure how accurate it is, but it is certainly the easiest to read) not only are E36 M3s in BSP (including LWs!) but also ZR1s, S2000, Z8 for cryin' out loud
DSP seems a much better fit performance-wsie IMHO... but I guess DSP is for 'sedans'? Heck, even ESP... where the 300zx non-turbo's are would be a better fit.
And what about stock? They are classed in E-stock!!
Again... I'm still learning about AutoX classifications... but at first glance it seems kinda arbitrary[/list]