Brian Herring wrote:
I have my thoughts about 'X' class... and PAX, but that is another thread.
Believe me, I'd probably agree. I'd just assume we didn't have an X class. But as long as we do have it, I'll run it.
Quote:
I will be in it next year dependng on PAX changes for 06. Needless to say, Fisher is untouchable right now with an HS PAX. An ESP STi would have a chance as it is equally as soft, but I digress.
Think about what you just said and why you said it. If you only care about winning, then go cherry pick the easiest class. You could probably find one you could dominate without even changing cars.
I think you are genuinely interested in good competition, however. If that's the case, why worry about PAX differences? I don't. I've never heard Eric Peterson seriously moan about soft PAXes at anything other than a ProSolo (where it *really* matters since there's tires on the line...and I've been moaning then, too). At a local event where you're worried about getting better and measuring yourself, well, the PAX "unfairness" isn't enough to worry about. Heck, I beat Carl by .850 on PAX at the Laurinburg 2 day, and nobody would argue that the CS pax is also soft. Granted I found a zone I may never find again and Carl was still probably learning that car (and he's a better autocrosser than me), but I'm just pointing out it can be done (and four other people beat him, one with an ES pax and everyone else with CS).
Anyway, my point is don't worry, be happy.

Which translates to run whatever class you want to run and don't worry about what the rest of us think. That's what I do.
--Donnie