Todd Breakey wrote:
I want to thank EVERYONE for their patience with all the "Hold Starts"
Me, too. As the raw sheets guy, the hold-up during the second heat was my fault, resulting in downtime and a couple re-runs. I either didn't record one car at the start (and didn't figure it out until several additional cars had finished) or a false start trigger occurred.
A couple 'issues' definitely contributed to this situation:
1. During that time, we had no 'buffer' - we were waiting for cars to come from grid to the start line, so each car was getting launched immediately as it came up from grid. Any distraction in the bus could easily result in missing a car coming up to start. AFAIK, this has never been an issue before (we've consistently kept several cars queued up at the start and/or announced car numbers at the start line), and I understood from the radio communications that the grid worker was having trouble seeing the start area. I guess either some big vehicle was parked in the way during heat 2 or that particular grid worker just needs some glasses.
2. The bus was so far from the finish that there was no way to confirm visually whether each car crossing the finish line was the one the time was being recorded for. If one car is missed at the start, or one doesn't physically break the finish beam, or an extra start or finish signal is captured, we're suddenly one car off without knowing it. This has been a problem in the past, several times since we started taking advantage of the new timing system's additional range, and I've complained about it enough. Nonetheless, anytime we locate the finish too far to see from the bus, the risk of a single, simple error causing downstream errors is increased significantly. Again, I'd sure prefer having the start far from the bus over the finish far from the bus. (Rant off)