MikeWhitney wrote:
Call me crazy, but without some extensive skidpad testing I just can't believe that a bigger front bar will make the car faster around a steady state corner. And I'm convinced that a bigger bar will take away from the excellent transitional looseness. Of course that can be changed with shocks.
In cases where there's enough grip to cause the outside suspension to compress to the bump-stops, a bigger front (and/or rear) sway bar would definitely help. Also, as Dick alluded to and I'm sure you know, autocross is mostly about transitions - a car that will change direction by responding more quickly to steering inputs will always have the advantage. Larger sway bars allow the body of the car to respond more instantaneously to steering input. Instead of wasting energy by leaning over as the initial response to steering input, the car's body more quickly follows the steering input.
MikeWhitney wrote:
Is it possible that the big-front-bar thing is just a function of driver preference? I hear so many people recommending doing it, but without hard numbers I'm skeptical.
A big front sway bar will also offer another advantage, especially on cars with McPherson strut front suspension. Installing a bigger bar results in less sway / body roll, and since the top of each strut is attached to the car's body, the outside front suspension geometry changes for the worse (gains positive camber) as the car's body rolls outward in a turn. The more you can reduce body roll, the less positive camber is gained under turning load. Of course, bigger sway bars aren't the only way to reduce body roll, but they are the only "real" way to do it in stock class. The other stock-legal way to reduce body roll is by using stiffer (higher damped) shocks, but that only helps in quick transitions, since the suspension will eventually end up in the same geometry, independent of shocks, under steady state loading.