⚠ Forum Archived — The THSCC forums were discontinued (last post: 2024-05-18). This read-only archive preserves club history. Visit thscc.com →  |  Search this archive with Google: site:forums.thscc.com your search terms

THSCC Forums

Tarheel Sports Car Club Forums
It is currently Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:09 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: event analysis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:40 pm 
Offline
Mr. Wizard
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 3:15 pm
Posts: 85
MilesBeam wrote:
We don't need an expensive or high tech solution for this. One simple answer is a worker, at the finish line, with a radio that can get the times and write them down on a sticky- which is handed to the driver. Somebody, possibly the announcer, could call the times out on the handheld radio. He would use a separate frequency that communicates just with the finish worker, so it doesn't interfere with course working.
That would be a great way to use an automated announcing program. Just have the T&S computer announce it over its speakers and leave a radio on beside it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Talk about THSCC Points Event #1: Comments here!
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:07 pm
Posts: 744
Location: Cary, NC
MikeWhitney wrote:
Getting back on topic to explain some things.

Communication of times and penalties last weekend was about as good as we have ever had it.


As a member of the timing & scoring team, I have to disagree (sorry Mike). From my viewpoint, communication of times & penalties was lacking compared to our typical past events. No fault of anyone, it's just that we were relying on a person to communicate the raw times instead of the usual automatic visual readout. Sometimes the announcers were being distracted and weren't able to get every single time announced - I noticed quite a few were missed - again, nobody's fault, it is what it is. As far as cone penalties go, again I think we fell short of our usual capabilities. From inside the bus, the reason was obvious. The loudest sound in the bus, by far, was the announcer's voice - the speakers attached to the bus were much closer and louder inside the bus than with our past set-up, which was more distracting to those of us trying to do timing & scoring. It was often hard to hear course workers/cone penalties, requiring multiple back-and-forth radio communications at times. It was also much more difficult to communicate cone penalties from inside the bus to the announcer, and as hard as I tried to make it happen, I ended up giving up at times just to avoid complicating the situation more by shouting cone penalties that might or might not get heard/announced.

Also, not a complaint about any particular event, etc., but personally, it's obvious that T&S runs smoother and is a whole lot less stressful when we can see car nos. at both the start and finish lines from inside the bus - it gives us the opportunity to double check the time for each car (instead of relying on "blind" faith that a car wasn't accidentally missed, etc.), and it keeps the airwaves clearer, since the starter doesn't call in each car no. at the line. While I agree that the flexibility of running course configurations we couldn't before the wireless set is beneficial, there is some downside to distant start or finish lines from the timing standpoint.

Just my opinion, FWIW.

_________________
Keith Q.
2008 Top Gun
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmX8XuZ_DCo&NR=1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:07 am 
Offline
I hate working the course at autox and I must tell you about it, often.

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:53 am
Posts: 1718
Keith,
Could you please cross post your comments into the thread Mike started about communicating times and penalties. I think this is very pertinent and makes a good point from the T&S folks perspective.
Graham

_________________
http://www.greywinds.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:25 pm
Posts: 770
Location: Greenville, NC
I'm still new to all this, but I think this club does a great job. I appreciate all the hard work that is done.
Regarding the course layout at Laurinburg - I didn't think there was anything wrong with the course. It was technically very good. However, it seems that when there is an opportunity for a longer course with higher speeds, we should take advantage of that opportunity. We are limited in some places to a tight, relatively lower speed course. Laurinburg isn't one of those. Perhaps there could be an "understanding" that Laurinburg's course would have some faster sections and be a bit longer.

_________________
Rubbin' is Racin'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 5:15 pm 
Offline
Tadpole Lover

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:42 pm
Posts: 3479
Amen. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group