JamesShort wrote:
More radios and a few sets of highly guarded headsets or hands-free sets are being investigated as we speak.
<

>
This was really the biggest single point of failure in the whole debacle. On his first run, we received a radio call from a course worker that the car was leaking fuel. We trusted the course worker's report, and we tried to reach out to Start and Grid to get them to alert the driver before his second run, but perhaps due to radios not working, not being loud enough, not being close enough to the worker's ear (I don't know why, just speculating), the message didn't get through to either Grid or Start before he launched for his second run.
On his second run, we received another radio call that the car was leaking fuel, and if I remember correctly, a complaint that the car was even allowed to run again. I completely agree with this complaint. I'm not sure exactly what our (SCCA? THSCC?) rule is regarding this, but if it were up to me, a car spotted leaking fluids on the course should be red flagged immediately, run aborted, and parked for the remainder of the event. If there's a fluid leak, this is not something that you're going to fix between runs and confirm fixed before putting the safety of yourself, course workers, and even just the overall condition of the course at risk. I don't suspect any fluids aid grip, and some are explosive, so why should we give any leeway on this?
The course is not an appropriate place to diagnose a fuel leak.Before his third run, we managed to get James' attention in time for him to speak with the driver as he was pulling up to Start. We assumed James would pull the driver from the line and have him park the car. This ended up leading to a hold start call several minutes later when we realized James had let him run again. We hadn't staged him, so times got out of sync
</

>