MarcusMcRae wrote:
Is that safe? I am computer network illiterate but I never use public wifi for fear of getting hacked.
Since this wireless access point won't be providing internet access, you won't be signing into your bank account, Facebook, other websites, etc.
Changing the network to a password-protected type wouldn't stop anyone with the network key and appropriate hardware/software within range from listening in on the network traffic anyway, due to the broadcast nature of 802.11 wireless networks. Since that password would have to be posted where anyone could see it, it wouldn't add any real security, just another hoop to jump through before you can see the coneage.
If we were to host the software on a website on the public internet, everyone would be dependent on their own cell provider's data coverage in order to reach it, and if the T&S laptop's data coverage flaked out, the results wouldn't stay up to date. But at least the guy standing next to you couldn't as easily sniff your requests to the T&S server and see whose results you were looking at, because of the switched network architecture in cell data networks. I think the minimal gain in theoretical security with this approach is drastically outweighed by the unpredictable experience it would provide. If all of our sites had great cell data coverage, I'd have a very different position on this.
tldr; if you want security theater, visit the TSA at an airport
Thanks for the explanation. I imagine it also depends on the security/firewalls on the device you're using.
I had to google security theater. That's funny.